PURPOSE: Medication safety is a critical concern for older adults. Regional variation in potentially inappropriate prescribing practices may reflect important differences in health care quality. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to characterize prescribing quality variation among older adults across geographic region, and to compare prescribing quality across rural versus urban residence. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 1,549,824 older adult veterans with regular Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care and medication use during fiscal year 2007. Prescribing quality was measured by 4 indicators of potentially inappropriate prescribing: Zhan criteria drugs to avoid, Fick criteria drugs to avoid, therapeutic duplication, and drug-drug interactions. Frequency differences across region and rural-urban residence were compared using adjusted odds-ratios. FINDINGS: Significant regional variation was observed for all indicators. Zhan criteria frequencies ranged from 13.2% in the Northeast to 21.2% in the South. Nationally, rural veterans had a significantly increased risk for inappropriate prescribing according to all quality indicators. However, regional analyses revealed this effect was limited to the South and Northeast, whereas rural residence was neutral in the Midwest and protective in the West. CONCLUSIONS: Significant regional variation in prescribing quality was observed among older adult veterans, mirroring recent findings among Medicare beneficiaries. The association between rurality and prescribing quality is heterogeneous, and relying solely on national estimates may yield misleading conclusions. Although we documented important variations in prescribing quality, the underlying factors driving these trends remain unknown, and they are a vital area for future research affecting older adults in both VA and non-VA health systems. No claim to original US government works.
PURPOSE: Medication safety is a critical concern for older adults. Regional variation in potentially inappropriate prescribing practices may reflect important differences in health care quality. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to characterize prescribing quality variation among older adults across geographic region, and to compare prescribing quality across rural versus urban residence. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 1,549,824 older adult veterans with regular Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care and medication use during fiscal year 2007. Prescribing quality was measured by 4 indicators of potentially inappropriate prescribing: Zhan criteria drugs to avoid, Fick criteria drugs to avoid, therapeutic duplication, and drug-drug interactions. Frequency differences across region and rural-urban residence were compared using adjusted odds-ratios. FINDINGS: Significant regional variation was observed for all indicators. Zhan criteria frequencies ranged from 13.2% in the Northeast to 21.2% in the South. Nationally, rural veterans had a significantly increased risk for inappropriate prescribing according to all quality indicators. However, regional analyses revealed this effect was limited to the South and Northeast, whereas rural residence was neutral in the Midwest and protective in the West. CONCLUSIONS: Significant regional variation in prescribing quality was observed among older adult veterans, mirroring recent findings among Medicare beneficiaries. The association between rurality and prescribing quality is heterogeneous, and relying solely on national estimates may yield misleading conclusions. Although we documented important variations in prescribing quality, the underlying factors driving these trends remain unknown, and they are a vital area for future research affecting older adults in both VA and non-VA health systems. No claim to original US government works.
Authors: Lars E Peterson; Andrew Bazemore; Elizabeth J Bragg; Imam Xierali; Gregg A Warshaw Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-03-25 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Alan N West; Richard E Lee; Michael D Shambaugh-Miller; Byron D Bair; Keith J Mueller; Ryan S Lilly; Peter J Kaboli; Kara Hawthorne Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2010 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Michael B Rothberg; Penelope S Pekow; Fengjuan Liu; Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki; Maura J Brennan; Sandra Bellantonio; Mark Heelon; Peter K Lindenauer Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Rachel VanGilder; Kara Wright; Michael Kelly; Robert B Wallace Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Thomas R Radomski; Chester B Good; Carolyn T Thorpe; Xinhua Zhao; Zachary A Marcum; Peter A Glassman; John Lowe; Maria K Mor; Michael J Fine; Walid F Gellad Journal: J Manag Care Spec Pharm Date: 2015-12-14
Authors: Holly M Holmes; Ruili Luo; Yong-Fang Kuo; Jacques Baillargeon; James S Goodwin Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Michael A Steinman; Yinghui Miao; W John Boscardin; Kiya D R Komaiko; Janice B Schwartz Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Kari R Gillmeyer; Seppo T Rinne; Mark E Glickman; Kyung Min Lee; Qing Shao; Shirley X Qian; Elizabeth S Klings; Bradley A Maron; Joseph T Hanlon; Donald R Miller; Renda Soylemez Wiener Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2020-05-12