Literature DB >> 23551526

Developing complex interventions for nursing: a critical review of key guidelines.

Margarita Corry1, Mike Clarke, Alison E While, Joan Lalor.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: To identify the most comprehensive approach to developing complex interventions for nursing research and practice.
BACKGROUND: The majority of research in nursing is descriptive and exploratory in nature. There is an increasing professional and political demand for nurses to develop and provide evidence to support their practices. Nurses need to explore current practice and develop and test interventions to provide the evidence required for safe practice.
DESIGN: A literature review using a systematic approach.
METHODS: The review was carried out using four databases: CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO and BNI (2000-2011), and the search was limited to 'brief interventions' and complex intervention development (January 2000-September 2011). Included papers reported on guidelines for intervention development or 'how' an intervention was developed.
RESULTS: Six papers reported on guidelines for developing interventions. There are many similarities between the guidelines with a similar pattern of guideline development in Europe and the USA. The only guideline reported to have been used in the development of interventions is the Medical Research Council framework (MRC) (A Framework for Developing and Evaluation of RCTs for Complex Interventions to Improve Health, 2000), with 9 of 14 papers that describe the development of an intervention reporting the use of this guideline. The other five papers did not mention the use of any guideline or framework.
CONCLUSIONS: The MRC (A Framework for Developing and Evaluation of RCTs for Complex Interventions to Improve Health, 2000) framework appears to be the most widely used guideline reported for developing complex interventions. Although the updated MRC (Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions, 2008) framework adds considerably to the original MRC (A Framework for Developing and Evaluation of RCTs for Complex Interventions to Improve Health, 2000) framework, other guidelines contribute additional guidance which can inform the development of nursing interventions. These additional guidelines are presented in a model for developing complex interventions for nursing. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The model will help nurses planning to develop nursing interventions as it provides additional and nursing-specific guidance to the MRC (Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions, 2008) framework for the development of complex interventions for nursing practice.
© 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complex interventions; frameworks; guidelines; literature review

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23551526     DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  23 in total

1.  Acceptability of a Guided Imagery Intervention for Persons Undergoing a Total Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Claire Burke Draucker; Ann F Jacobson; Wendy A Umberger; Rodney P Myerscough; Jessica D Sanata
Journal:  Orthop Nurs       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.913

Review 2.  Reporting quality of music intervention research in healthcare: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sheri L Robb; Deanna Hanson-Abromeit; Lindsey May; Eugenia Hernandez-Ruiz; Megan Allison; Alyssa Beloat; Sarah Daugherty; Rebecca Kurtz; Alyssa Ott; Oladele Oladimeji Oyedele; Shelbi Polasik; Allison Rager; Jamie Rifkin; Emily Wolf
Journal:  Complement Ther Med       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.446

3.  Developing and evaluating complex interventions.

Authors:  Chris Sutton
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Introducing case management for people with dementia in primary care: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Steve Iliffe; Louise Robinson; Claire Bamford; Amy Waugh; Chris Fox; Gill Livingston; Jill Manthorpe; Pat Brown; Barbara Stephens; Katie Brittain; Carolyn Chew-Graham; Cornelius Katona
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Telephone interventions, delivered by healthcare professionals, for providing education and psychosocial support for informal caregivers of adults with diagnosed illnesses.

Authors:  Margarita Corry; Kathleen Neenan; Sally Brabyn; Greg Sheaf; Valerie Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-14

6.  The Feasibility and Acceptability of LISTEN for Loneliness.

Authors:  Laurie A Theeke; Jennifer A Mallow; Emily R Barnes; Elliott Theeke
Journal:  Open J Nurs       Date:  2015-05-01

7.  Criteria for Reporting the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions in healthcare: revised guideline (CReDECI 2).

Authors:  Ralph Möhler; Sascha Köpke; Gabriele Meyer
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Development of a behaviour change intervention to increase upper limb exercise in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Louise A Connell; Naoimh E McMahon; Judith Redfern; Caroline L Watkins; Janice J Eng
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Development of a theory-based intervention to increase cognitively able frail elders' engagement with advance care planning using the behaviour change wheel.

Authors:  S Combes; G Forbes; K Gillett; C Norton; C J Nicholson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Study protocol: mobile improvement of self-management ability through rural technology (mI SMART).

Authors:  Jennifer A Mallow; Laurie A Theeke; Dustin M Long; Tara Whetsel; Elliott Theeke; Brian K Mallow
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-08-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.