OBJECTIVE: To determine community health workers' (CHWs) competence in identifying and referring sick newborns in Uganda. METHODS: Case-vignettes, observations of role-plays and interviews were employed to collect data using checklists and semistructured questionnaires, from 57 trained CHWs participating in a community health facility-linked cluster randomised trial. Competence to identify and refer sick newborns was measured by knowledge of newborn danger signs, skills to identify sick newborns and effective communication to mothers. Proportions and median scores were computed for each attribute with a pre-defined pass mark of 100% for knowledge and 90% for skill and communication. RESULTS: For knowledge, 68% of the CHWs attained the pass mark. The median percentage score was 100 (IQR 94 100). 74% mentioned the required five newborn danger signs unprompted. 'Red umbilicus/cord with pus' was mentioned by all CHWs (100%), but none mentioned chest in-drawing and grunting as newborn danger signs. 63% attained the pass mark for both skill and communication. The median percentage scores were 91 (IQR 82 100) for skills and 94 (IQR 89, 94) for effective communication. 98% correctly identified the four case-vignettes as sick or not sick newborn. 'Preterm birth' was the least identified danger sign from the case-vignettes, by 51% of the CHWs. CONCLUSION: CHWs trained for a short period but effectively supervised are competent in identifying and referring sick newborns in a poor resource setting.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine community health workers' (CHWs) competence in identifying and referring sick newborns in Uganda. METHODS: Case-vignettes, observations of role-plays and interviews were employed to collect data using checklists and semistructured questionnaires, from 57 trained CHWs participating in a community health facility-linked cluster randomised trial. Competence to identify and refer sick newborns was measured by knowledge of newborn danger signs, skills to identify sick newborns and effective communication to mothers. Proportions and median scores were computed for each attribute with a pre-defined pass mark of 100% for knowledge and 90% for skill and communication. RESULTS: For knowledge, 68% of the CHWs attained the pass mark. The median percentage score was 100 (IQR 94 100). 74% mentioned the required five newborn danger signs unprompted. 'Red umbilicus/cord with pus' was mentioned by all CHWs (100%), but none mentioned chest in-drawing and grunting as newborn danger signs. 63% attained the pass mark for both skill and communication. The median percentage scores were 91 (IQR 82 100) for skills and 94 (IQR 89, 94) for effective communication. 98% correctly identified the four case-vignettes as sick or not sick newborn. 'Preterm birth' was the least identified danger sign from the case-vignettes, by 51% of the CHWs. CONCLUSION: CHWs trained for a short period but effectively supervised are competent in identifying and referring sick newborns in a poor resource setting.
Authors: Peter Waiswa; George Pariyo; Karin Kallander; Joseph Akuze; Gertrude Namazzi; Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho; Kate Kerber; Hanifah Sengendo; Patrick Aliganyira; Joy E Lawn; Stefan Peterson Journal: Glob Health Action Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 2.640
Authors: Monica Okuga; Margaret Kemigisa; Sarah Namutamba; Gertrude Namazzi; Peter Waiswa Journal: Glob Health Action Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 2.640
Authors: Richard Mangwi Ayiasi; Patrick Kolsteren; Vincent Batwala; Bart Criel; Christopher Garimoi Orach Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marie A Brault; Kenneth Ngure; Connie A Haley; Stewart Kabaka; Kibet Sergon; Teshome Desta; Kasonde Mwinga; Sten H Vermund; Aaron M Kipp Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Daniel C Mays; Edward J O'Neil; Edison A Mworozi; Benjamin J Lough; Zachary J Tabb; Ashlyn E Whitlock; Edward M Mutimba; Zohray M Talib Journal: Int J Equity Health Date: 2017-07-20