Literature DB >> 23551390

A randomized and controlled clinical trial of two different compositions of deproteinized bovine bone and autogenous bone used for lateral ridge augmentation.

Arne Mordenfeld1,2,3, Carina B Johansson4, Tomas Albrektsson3,5, Mats Hallman1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to radiologically and histologically evaluate the graft healing and volumetric changes after lateral augmentation with two different compositions of deproteinized bovine bone (DPBB) and autogenous bone (AB).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with a mean age of 59.6 ± 12.1 years (six men and seven women) were included in this randomized and controlled trial, designed as a split-mouth study. Ten edentulous and four partially edentulous jaws with an alveolar ridge width of ≤4 mm were laterally augmented with a graft composition of 60 : 40 (DPBB/AB) on one side and 90 : 10 (DPBB/AB) on the contralateral side. Cone beam computed tomography (CB/CT) was obtained immediately postoperatively and after a healing period of 7.5 months. Width changes were measured on CB/CT scans. After a mean healing period of 8.1 months (range, 7.9-8.3), biopsies were retrieved perpendicular to the crest from each graft by means of a trephine bur. Histomorphometry was performed, and the following variables were recorded: Ingrowth of new bone (percentage of total graft width), percentage of DPBB, bone and soft tissue, and percentage of DPBB particles in contact with bone.
RESULTS: The mean gained width of the alveolar crest after 7.5 months was significantly more for the 60 : 40 mixture compared with the 90 : 10 mixture, 3.5 (±1.3) mm and 2.9 (±1.3) mm, respectively. There was a significant difference in graft width reduction between 60 : 40 and 90 : 10 after 7.5 months, 37 (±19.9)% and 46.9 (±23.5)%, respectively. New bone ingrowth had occurred in 82.1 (±23.3)% and 82.3 (±26.6)% of the graft, respectively. There were no statistical differences between fractions of different tissues between the 90 : 10 and 60 : 40 compositions. However, there were significantly more soft tissue and less new bone formation closer to the periosteum compared with the graft portion closer to the residual bone in both 60 : 40 and 90 : 10 compositions.
CONCLUSIONS: There was significantly less graft width reduction with a mixture of 60 : 40 (DPBB/AB) compared with a mixture of 90 : 10 composition, but the results from the histomorphometry showed no statistical differences comparing the groups.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autogenous bone graft; bovine hydroxyapatite; clinical study; fibrin glue; histology; maxillary sinus floor augmentation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23551390     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  7 in total

1.  Assessment of residual alveolar bone volume in hemodialysis patients using CBCT.

Authors:  Dan Zhao; Xiaolei Chen; Li Yue; Weiqing Liu; Anchun Mo; Haiyang Yu; Quan Yuan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of Bone Resorption Rates after Intraoral Block Bone and Guided Bone Regeneration Augmentation for the Reconstruction of Horizontally Deficient Maxillary Alveolar Ridges.

Authors:  B Alper Gultekin; Elcin Bedeloglu; T Emre Kose; Eitan Mijiritsky
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Nanostructured Carbonated Hydroxyapatite for Alveolar Bone Repair.

Authors:  Rodrigo F B Resende; Suelen C Sartoretto; Marcelo J Uzeda; Adriana T N N Alves; José A Calasans-Maia; Alexandre M Rossi; José Mauro Granjeiro; Mônica D Calasans-Maia
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Guided Bone Regeneration in the Edentulous Atrophic Maxilla Using Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral (DBBM) Combined with Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF)-A Prospective Study.

Authors:  João Manuel Mendez Caramês; Filipe Araújo Vieira; Gonçalo Bártolo Caramês; Ana Catarina Pinto; Helena Cristina Oliveira Francisco; Duarte Nuno da Silva Marques
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 5.  Horizontal augmentation techniques in the mandible: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ralf Smeets; Levi Matthies; Peter Windisch; Martin Gosau; Ronald Jung; Nadine Brodala; Martina Stefanini; Johannes Kleinheinz; Michael Payer; Anders Henningsen; Bilal Al-Nawas; Christian Knipfer
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-05-09

6.  A Preshaped Titanium Mesh for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Equine-Derived Bone Graft in a Posterior Mandibular Bone Defect: A Case Report.

Authors:  Danilo Alessio Di Stefano; Gianbattista Greco; Enrico Gherlone
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-01

7.  Influence of the bone graft materials used for guided bone regeneration on subsequent peri-implant inflammation: an experimental ligature-induced peri-implantitis model in Beagle dogs.

Authors:  Ryo Sato; Takanori Matsuura; Tatsuya Akizuki; Shunsuke Fukuba; Munehiro Okada; Kohei Nohara; Shunsuke Takeuchi; Shu Hoshi; Wataru Ono; Kiichi Maruyama; Yuichi Izumi; Takanori Iwata
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-01-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.