Literature DB >> 23551151

The role of active assortment in spousal similarity.

David Watson1, Andrew Beer, Elizabeth McDade-Montez.   

Abstract

Previous research has established the existence of active assortment, that is, a preference for similarity in a potential mate. Few studies, however, have directly related mate preferences to dyadic similarity by examining them in the same participants. We collected both similarity and mate preference data in two studies: undergraduate students (N = 519) and newlyweds (N = 335). In both studies, women placed a higher value on desirable personality characteristics (e.g., higher Conscientiousness and Agreeableness, lower Neuroticism) than did men. Nevertheless, our data also provided strong evidence of consensual mate preferences: Men and women both desired partners who were agreeable, conscientious, emotionally stable, intelligent, and physically attractive; furthermore, participants desired partners who were better (e.g., more agreeable and attractive) than they were. In contrast, attitudinal variables such as religiousness and political orientation displayed much weaker consensus but showed significant dyadic similarity in both samples; similarity coefficients for personality tended to be positive, but lower. Finally, analyses revealed a direct link between actual and desired similarity: Couples displayed the strongest similarity on those variables for which participants expressed the strongest preference for similarity. Our findings strongly suggest that active assortment is partly responsible for dyadic similarity.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23551151     DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers        ISSN: 0022-3506


  5 in total

1.  Linked Lives: Dyadic Associations of Mastery Beliefs With Health (Behavior) and Health (Behavior) Change Among Older Partners.

Authors:  Johanna Drewelies; William J Chopik; Christiane A Hoppmann; Jacqui Smith; Denis Gerstorf
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 2.  Why do we pick similar mates, or do we?

Authors:  Thomas M M Versluys; Ewan O Flintham; Alex Mas-Sandoval; Vincent Savolainen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Longitudinal actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on well-being.

Authors:  Manon A van Scheppingen; William J Chopik; Wiebke Bleidorn; Jaap J A Denissen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2018-08-13

4.  Singles' Reasons for Being Single: Empirical Evidence From an Evolutionary Perspective.

Authors:  Menelaos Apostolou; Jiaqing O; Gianluca Esposito
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-05-06

5.  Spouses' faces are similar but do not become more similar with time.

Authors:  Pin Pin Tea-Makorn; Michal Kosinski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.