Literature DB >> 23551041

When precaution creates misunderstandings: the unintended effects of precautionary information on perceived risks, the EMF case.

Peter M Wiedemann1, Holger Schuetz, Franziska Boerner, Martin Clauberg, Rodney Croft, Rajesh Shukla, Toshiko Kikkawa, Ray Kemp, Jan M Gutteling, Barney de Villiers, Flavia N da Silva Medeiros, Julie Barnett.   

Abstract

In the past decade, growing public concern about novel technologies with uncertain potential long-term impacts on the environment and human health has moved risk policies toward a more precautionary approach. Focusing on mobile telephony, the effects of precautionary information on risk perception were analyzed. A pooled multinational experimental study based on a 5 × 2 × 2 factorial design was conducted in nine countries. The first factor refers to whether or not information on different types of precautionary measures was present, the second factor to the framing of the precautionary information, and the third factor to the order in which cell phones and base stations were rated by the study participants. The data analysis on the country level indicates different effects. The main hypothesis that informing about precautionary measures results in increased risk perceptions found only partial support in the data. The effects are weaker, both in terms of the effect size and the frequency of significant effects, across the various precautionary information formats used in the experiment. Nevertheless, our findings do not support the assumption that informing people about implemented precautionary measures will decrease public concerns.
© 2013 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EMF; precaution; risk perception

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23551041     DOI: 10.1111/risa.12034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  4 in total

1.  Improving Precautionary Communication in the EMF Field? Effects of Making Messages Consistent and Explaining the Effectiveness of Precautions.

Authors:  Christoph Boehmert; Peter Wiedemann; Rodney Croft
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-10-09       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? An experimental risk communication study.

Authors:  Christoph Boehmert; Adam Verrender; Mario Pauli; Peter Wiedemann
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 5.984

3.  Exposure Perception as a Key Indicator of Risk Perception and Acceptance of Sources of Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields.

Authors:  Frederik Freudenstein; Peter M Wiedemann; Tim W C Brown
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2015-07-01

4.  Exposure Knowledge and Perception of Wireless Communication Technologies.

Authors:  Frederik Freudenstein; Luis M Correia; Carla Oliveira; Daniel Sebastião; Peter M Wiedemann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.