Literature DB >> 23550611

Quantifying the effect of habitat availability on species distributions.

Geert Aarts1, John Fieberg, Sophie Brasseur, Jason Matthiopoulos.   

Abstract

1. If animals moved randomly in space, the use of different habitats would be proportional to their availability. Hence, deviations from proportionality between use and availability are considered the tell-tale sign of preference. This principle forms the basis for most habitat selection and species distribution models fitted to use-availability or count data (e.g. MaxEnt and Resource Selection Functions). 2. Yet, once an essential habitat type is sufficiently abundant to meet an individual's needs, increased availability of this habitat type may lead to a decrease in the use/availability ratio. Accordingly, habitat selection functions may estimate negative coefficients when habitats are superabundant, incorrectly suggesting an apparent avoidance. Furthermore, not accounting for the effects of availability on habitat use may lead to poor predictions, particularly when applied to habitats that differ considerably from those for which data have been collected. 3. Using simulations, we show that habitat use varies non-linearly with habitat availability, even when individuals follow simple movement rules to acquire food and avoid risk. The results show that the impact of availability strongly depends on the type of habitat (e.g. whether it is essential or substitutable) and how it interacts with the distribution and availability of other habitats. 4. We demonstrate the utility of a variety of existing and new methods that enable the influence of habitat availability to be explicitly estimated. Models that allow for non-linear effects (using b-spline smoothers) and interactions between environmental covariates defining habitats and measures of their availability were best able to capture simulated patterns of habitat use across a range of environments. 5. An appealing aspect of some of the methods we discuss is that the relative influence of availability is not defined a priori, but directly estimated by the model. This feature is likely to improve model prediction, hint at the mechanism of habitat selection, and may signpost habitats that are critical for the organism's fitness.
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate change; conservation; discrete choice models; foraging; generalized additive model; generalized functional response; generalized linear mixed effect model; inhomogeneous Poisson point process; integrated nested Laplace approximation; sampling design; spline smoother

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23550611     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  15 in total

1.  Understanding spatial distributions: negative density-dependence in prey causes predators to trade-off prey quantity with quality.

Authors:  Allert I Bijleveld; Robert B MacCurdy; Ying-Chi Chan; Emma Penning; Rich M Gabrielson; John Cluderay; Eric L Spaulding; Anne Dekinga; Sander Holthuijsen; Job ten Horn; Maarten Brugge; Jan A van Gils; David W Winkler; Theunis Piersma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Predicting population change from models based on habitat availability and utilization.

Authors:  Jason Matthiopoulos; Christopher Field; Ross MacLeod
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Home ranges, habitat and body mass: simple correlates of home range size in ungulates.

Authors:  Endre Grüner Ofstad; Ivar Herfindal; Erling Johan Solberg; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Conceptual and methodological advances in habitat-selection modeling: guidelines for ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Joseph M Northrup; Eric Vander Wal; Maegwin Bonar; John Fieberg; Michel P Laforge; Martin Leclerc; Christina M Prokopenko; Brian D Gerber
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 6.105

5.  Increasing fire frequency and severity will increase habitat loss for a boreal forest indicator species.

Authors:  Eric C Palm; Michael J Suitor; Kyle Joly; Jim D Herriges; Allicia P Kelly; Dave Hervieux; Kelsey L M Russell; Torsten W Bentzen; Nicholas C Larter; Mark Hebblewhite
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 6.105

6.  Poor transferability of species distribution models for a pelagic predator, the grey petrel, indicates contrasting habitat preferences across ocean basins.

Authors:  Leigh G Torres; Philip J H Sutton; David R Thompson; Karine Delord; Henri Weimerskirch; Paul M Sagar; Erica Sommer; Ben J Dilley; Peter G Ryan; Richard A Phillips
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Predictive habitat suitability models to aid conservation of elasmobranch diversity in the central Mediterranean Sea.

Authors:  V Lauria; M Gristina; M J Attrill; F Fiorentino; G Garofalo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Ensemble modeling to predict habitat suitability for a large-scale disturbance specialist.

Authors:  Quresh S Latif; Victoria A Saab; Jonathan G Dudley; Jeff P Hollenbeck
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 9.  Plasmodium knowlesi transmission: integrating quantitative approaches from epidemiology and ecology to understand malaria as a zoonosis.

Authors:  P M Brock; K M Fornace; M Parmiter; J Cox; C J Drakeley; H M Ferguson; R R Kao
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Resource-Area-Dependence Analysis: Inferring animal resource needs from home-range and mapping data.

Authors:  Robert E Kenward; Eduardo M Arraut; Peter A Robertson; Sean S Walls; Nicholas M Casey; Nicholas J Aebischer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.