| Literature DB >> 23549229 |
Feng Yang1, Liqiang Zhao, Xiwu Yan, Yuan Wang.
Abstract
The Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum is one of the most important commercial bivalve species consumed in China. Evaluated metal burden in bivalve molluscs can pose potential risks to public health as a result of their frequent consumption. In this study, concentrations of 10 trace elements (Cu, Zn, Mn, Se, Ni, Cd, Cr, Pb, Hg and As) were determined in samples of the bivalve Ruditapes philippinarum, collected from nine mariculture zones along the coast of China between November and December in 2010, in order to evaluate the status of elemental metal pollution in these areas. Also, a public health risk assessment was untaken to assess the potential risks associated with the consumption of clams. The ranges of concentrations found for Cu, Zn, Mn, Se, Ni, Cd, Cr, Pb, Hg and As in R. philippinarum were 12.1-38.0, 49.5-168.3, 42.0-68.0, 4.19-8.71, 4.76-14.32, 0.41-1.11, 0.94-4.74, 0.32-2.59, 0.03-0.23 and 0.46-11.95 mg·kg(-1) dry weight, respectively. Clear spatial variations were found for Cu, Zn, Cr, Pb, Hg and As, whereas Mn, Se, Ni, and Cd did not show significant spatial variation. Hotspots of trace element contamination in R. philippinarum can be found along the coast of China, from the north to the south, especially in the Bohai and Yellow Seas. Based on a 58.1 kg individual consuming 29 g of bivalve molluscs per day, the values of the estimated daily intake (EDI) of trace elements analyzed were significantly lower than the values of the accepted daily intake (ADI) established by Joint Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization Expert Committee on Food Additives (JFAO/WHO) and the guidelines of the reference does (RfD) established by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Additionally, the risk of trace elements to humans through R. philippinarum consumption was also assessed. The calculated hazard quotients (HQ) of all trace elements were less than 1. Consequently, there was no obvious public risk from the intake of these trace elements through R. philippinarum consumption.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23549229 PMCID: PMC3709324 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph10041392
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Map of the sampling sites along the coast of China.
Figure 2Trace element concentrations (mg·kg−1 dry weight) in Ruditapes philippinarum along the coast of China. Values with different marks represent significant difference at the significance level of 0.05. Data are expressed as mean ±SD (n = 3). QHD: Qinghuangdao; DL: Dalian; QD: Qingdao; LYG: Lianyungang; NB: Ningbo; FZ: Fuzhou; XM: Xiamen; SZ: Shenzheng; BH: Beihai.
Estimateddaily intake (EDI) (mg·kg−1 bw·day−1)and hazard quotients (HQs) of trace elements through Ruditapes philippinarum consumption by people in China. Data reported based on wet weight are converted to dry weight basis for comparison using a wet weight/dry weight ratio of 7. PTWI (mg·kg−1 bw): provisional tolerance weekly; ADI (mg·kg−1 bw·day−1): Acceptable daily intake; Average concentrations of inorganic As were estimated as 10% of total As. n.a.: no available data.
| Location | Cu | Zn | Mn | Se | Ni | Cd | Cr | Pb | Hg | As | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qinghuangdao | EDI | 0.002710 | 0.012001 | 0.003872 | 0.000509 | 0.000592 | 0.000046 | 0.000118 | 0.000048 | 0.000016 | 0.000047 |
| HQ | 0.0678 | 0.0400 | 0.0277 | 0.1018 | 0.0118 | 0.0460 | 0.0393 | n.a. | 0.0533 | 0.1175 | |
| Dalian | EDI | 0.001904 | 0.008721 | 0.004849 | 0.000299 | 0.000739 | 0.000053 | 0.000155 | 0.000046 | 0.000011 | 0.000031 |
| HQ | 0.0476 | 0.0291 | 0.0346 | 0.0598 | 0.0148 | 0.0530 | 0.0517 | n.a. | 0.0367 | 0.0775 | |
| Qingdao | EDI | 0.001376 | 0.005441 | 0.004086 | 0.000519 | 0.001021 | 0.000058 | 0.000338 | 0.000061 | 0.000006 | 0.000069 |
| HQ | 0.0344 | 0.0181 | 0.0292 | 0.1038 | 0.0204 | 0.0580 | 0.1127 | n.a. | 0.0200 | 0.1725 | |
| Lianyungang | EDI | 0.001184 | 0.006132 | 0.003922 | 0.000503 | 0.000724 | 0.000070 | 0.000241 | 0.000046 | 0.000005 | 0.000059 |
| HQ | 0.0296 | 0.0204 | 0.0280 | 0.1006 | 0.0145 | 0.0700 | 0.0803 | n.a. | 0.0167 | 0.1475 | |
| Ningbo | EDI | 0.001262 | 0.003530 | 0.004114 | 0.000466 | 0.000530 | 0.000069 | 0.000214 | 0.000127 | 0.000006 | 0.000027 |
| HQ | 0.0316 | 0.0118 | 0.0294 | 0.0932 | 0.0106 | 0.0690 | 0.0713 | n.a. | 0.0200 | 0.0675 | |
| Fuzhou | EDI | 0.001376 | 0.004207 | 0.005398 | 0.000367 | 0.000339 | 0.000056 | 0.000208 | 0.000185 | 0.000006 | 0.000023 |
| HQ | 0.0344 | 0.0140 | 0.0386 | 0.0734 | 0.0068 | 0.0560 | 0.0693 | n.a. | 0.0200 | 0.0575 | |
| Xiamen | EDI | 0.001547 | 0.004613 | 0.003209 | 0.000583 | 0.000944 | 0.000079 | 0.000139 | 0.000171 | 0.000004 | 0.000021 |
| HQ | 0.0387 | 0.0154 | 0.0229 | 0.1166 | 0.0189 | 0.0790 | 0.0463 | n.a. | 0.0133 | 0.0525 | |
| Shenzheng | EDI | 0.001690 | 0.005155 | 0.004613 | 0.000621 | 0.000792 | 0.000053 | 0.000080 | 0.000031 | 0.000004 | 0.000004 |
| HQ | 0.0423 | 0.0172 | 0.0330 | 0.1242 | 0.0158 | 0.0530 | 0.0267 | n.a. | 0.0133 | 0.0100 | |
| Beihai | EDI | 0.000863 | 0.005041 | 0.003872 | 0.000504 | 0.000695 | 0.000073 | 0.000086 | 0.000032 | 0.000004 | 0.000005 |
| HQ | 0.0216 | 0.0168 | 0.0277 | 0.1008 | 0.0139 | 0.0730 | 0.0287 | n.a. | 0.0133 | 0.0125 | |
| PTWI | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0.98 | 0.035 | n.a. | 0.007 | n.a. | 0.025 | 0.005 | 0.015 | |
| ADI | 0.5 | 0.21 | 0.14 | 0.005 | n.a. | 0.001 | n.a. | 0.0036 | 0.0007 | 0.0021 | |
| RfD | 0.04 | 0.3 | 0.14 | 0.005 | 0.05 | 0.001 | 0.003 | n.a. | 0.0003 | 0.0004 | |
Comparison trace element concentrations (mg·kg−1 dry weight) in Ruditapes philippinarum obtained in the present study with literature data from China and other regions all over the world. n.a.: no available data.
| Region | Cu | Zn | Mn | Se | Ni | Cd | Cr | Pb | Hg | As | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bohai Sea, China | 20.0–38.0 | 122.3–168.3 | 47.5–68.0 | 4.19–7.14 | 8.30–12.26 | 0.64–0.75 | 1.66–2.29 | 0.64–0.72 | 0.15–0.23 | 4.31–6.62 | This study |
| Yellow Sea, China | 14.0–19.3 | 76.3–86.0 | 51.0–57.3 | 6.24–7.28 | 10.15–14.32 | 0.42–0.98 | 3.38–4.74, | 0.65–0.86 | 0.07–0.09 | 8.25–11.95 | This study |
| East China Sea, China | 17.7–21.7 | 49.5–64.7 | 45.0–75.7 | 5.15–8.18 | 4.76–13.24 | 0.79–1.11 | 1.95–3.00 | 1.78–2.59 | 0.06–0.09 | 2.90–3.79 | This study |
| South China Sea, China | 12.1–23.7 | 50.7–72.3 | 42.0–64.7 | 6.21–8.71 | 8.40–9.74 | 0.41–1.03 | 0.94–1.25 | 0.32–0.54 | 0.03–0.06 | 0.46–0.85 | This study |
| Bohai Sea, China | 7.5–25.7 | 58.5–190.5 | 14.1–94.8 | 2.66–23.10 | 9.90–14.25 | 0.82–3.71 | 0.94–19.1 | 0.47–2.00 | 0.08–0.27 | 9.9–14.25 | [ |
| Bohai Sea, China | 8.96–30.59 | 70.0–140.4 | n.a. | n.a. | 5.04–20.79 | 0.98–4.41 | n.a. | 0.91–2.38 | n.a. | n.a. | [ |
| Jiaozhou Bay, China | 5.1–26.0 | 52.1–110.3 | 10.3–63.9 | n.a. | 5.26–52.75 | 0.65–3.31 | 9.64–35.47 | 0.89–14.77 | n.a. | n.a. | [ |
| Jiaozhou Bay, China | 7.7–9.1 | 62.2–87.1 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 0.39–0.68 | 0.96–4.04 | 0.53–1.42 | 0.04–0.07 | 8.32–14.33 | [ |
| Jiaozhou Bay, China | 8.8–21.5 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 0.07–1.05 | 9.03–10.92 | 2.10–3.64 | 0.02–0.21 | 9.80–15.54 | [ |
| Jiaozhou Bay, China | 6.4–19.8 | 35.5–85.5 | 27.45–67.6 | n.a. | n.a. | 0.51–0.67 | n.a. | 0.31–1.01 | n.a. | n.a. | [ |
| East China Sea, China | 9.2–14.4 | 26.0–73.5 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 0.48–0.85 | n.a. | 0.23–0.42 | 0.06–0.15 | 2.47–3.45 | [ |
| South China Sea, China | 6.0–10.0 | 71.0–116.0 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 0.60–5.00 | 0.20–14.50 | 0.80–2.70 | n.a. | n.a. | [ |
| Pearl River Delta, China | 4.0–10.1 | 39.4–212.9 | n.a. | n.a. | 5.04–5.88 | 0.42–1.19 | 3.85–4.13 | 1.47–1.75 | n.a. | n.a. | [ |
| Pearl River Delta, China | 5.2–13.9 | 54.9–74.6 | n.a. | n.a. | 9.78–23.72 | 0.30–7.60 | 3.13–12.25 | 1.50–14.99 | n.a. | n.a. | [ |
| Southern Atlantic, Spanish | 5.1–26.0 | 52.1–110.3 | 10.3–63.9 | n.a. | 5.26–52.75 | 0.47–2.71 | 9.6–35.5 | 0.41–1.94 | 0.13–2.72 | 12.60–32.20 | [ |
| Gironde Estuary, France | 9.4 ± 1.0 | 97.2 ± 8.0 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 0.52 ± 0.11 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | [ |
| Kyeonggi Bay, Korea | 5.5–14.3 | 64.7–162.0 | 20.5–177.0 | n.a. | 2.74–33.50 | 0.53–2.20 | 0.61–2.38 | 0.34–1.72 | n.a. | n.a. | [ |
| Shihwa Lake, Korea | 6.6–23.2 | 70.0–144.0 | n.a. | n.a. | 3.20–13.4 | 0.56–1.11 | 0.42–1.40 | 0.50–1.82 | n.a. | 12.4–18.3 | [ |
| Venice lagoon, Italy | 8.2–29.0 | 60.0–122.0 | 8.0–29.1 | n.a. | 0.15–8.37 | 0.26–2.19 | 1.89–5.70 | 0.49–2.54 | 0.25–2.30 | 18.90–64.00 | [ |