Literature DB >> 23548996

Variation among local health units in follow-up care of breast cancer patients in Emilia-Romagna, Italy.

Maurizio Leoni1, Radha Sadacharan, Daniel Louis, Fabio Falcini, Carol Rabinowitz, Luca Cisbani, Rossana De Palma, Elaine Yuen, Roberto Grilli.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
BACKGROUND: This study examines the patterns of follow-up care for breast cancer survivors in one region in Italy. METHODS AND STUDY
DESIGN: This retrospective analysis included 10,024 surgically treated women, with incident cases of breast cancer in the years 2002-2005 who were alive 18 months after their incidence date. Rates of use of follow-up mammograms, abdominal echogram, bone scans and chest x-rays were estimated from administrative data and compared by Local Health Unit (LHU) of residence. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess possible "overuse", accounting for patient age, cancer stage, type of surgery and LHU of residence.
RESULTS: A total of 7168 (72.1%) women received a mammogram within 18 months of their incidence date, while 6432 (64.2%) had an abdominal echogram, 3852 (38.4%) had a bone scan and 5231 (52.2%) had a chest x-ray. The rates of use of abdominal echograms, bone scans and chest x-rays were substantially higher in the population of breast cancer survivors than in the general female population. Taking account of patient age, cancer stage at diagnosis and type of surgery, multivariate analyses demonstrated significant variation in the use of these tests by LHU of residence.
CONCLUSIONS: The observed variation in the use of abdominal echograms, bone scans and chest x-rays supports the conclusion that there is substantial misuse of these tests in the population of postsurgical breast cancer patients in the Emilia-Romagna region in Italy. In the absence of a documented survival benefit, overtesting has both a human and financial cost. We recommend additional review of the methods of follow-up care in breast cancer patients in the LHUs of Emilia-Romagna, with the aim of developing, disseminating and evaluating the implementation of specific guidelines targeting primary care physicians and oncologists providing care to breast cancer survivors. Patient education materials may also help to reduce unnecessary testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23548996     DOI: 10.1177/030089161309900105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumori        ISSN: 0300-8916


  4 in total

1.  Breast cancer "tailored follow-up" in Italian oncology units: a web-based survey.

Authors:  Clara Natoli; Davide Brocco; Isabella Sperduti; Antonio Nuzzo; Nicola Tinari; Michele De Tursi; Antonino Grassadonia; Lorenzo Mazzilli; Stefano Iacobelli; Teresa Gamucci; Patrizia Vici
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Imaging tests in staging and surveillance of non-metastatic breast cancer: changes in routine clinical practice and cost implications.

Authors:  S De Placido; C De Angelis; M Giuliano; C Pizzi; R Ruocco; V Perrone; D Bruzzese; G Tommasielli; M De Laurentiis; S Cammarota; G Arpino; G Arpino
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 3.  Breast cancer follow-up strategies in randomized phase III adjuvant clinical trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Isabella Sperduti; Patrizia Vici; Nicola Tinari; Teresa Gamucci; Michele De Tursi; Giada Cortese; Antonino Grassadonia; Stefano Iacobelli; Clara Natoli
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-11-11

4.  Better organized care via care pathways: A multicenter study.

Authors:  Deborah Seys; Luk Bruyneel; Svin Deneckere; Seval Kul; Liz Van der Veken; Ruben van Zelm; Walter Sermeus; Massimiliano Panella; Kris Vanhaecht
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.