Liu Yang1, Haibo Sha, Robin L Davisson, Ling Qi. 1. Graduate Program in Biochemistry, Molecular and Cell Biology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The cross-talk between UPR activation and metabolic stress remains largely unclear. RESULTS: Phenformin treatment activates the IRE1α and PERK pathways in an AMPK-dependent manner. CONCLUSION: AMPK is required for phenformin-mediated IRE1α and PERK activation. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings demonstrate the cross-talk between UPR and metabolic signals. Activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR) is associated with the disruption of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) homeostasis and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of many human metabolic diseases, including obesity and type 2 diabetes. However, the nature of the signals activating UPR under these conditions remains largely unknown. Using a method that we recently optimized to directly measure UPR sensor activation, we screened the effect of various metabolic drugs on UPR activation and show that the anti-diabetic drug phenformin activates UPR sensors IRE1α and pancreatic endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) in both an ER-dependent and ER-independent manner. Mechanistically, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation is required but not sufficient to initiate phenformin-mediated IRE1α and PERK activation, suggesting the involvement of additional factor(s). Interestingly, activation of the IRE1α (but not PERK) pathway is partially responsible for the cytotoxic effect of phenformin. Together, our data show the existence of a non-canonical UPR whose activation requires the cytosolic kinase AMPK, adding another layer of complexity to UPR activation upon metabolic stress.
BACKGROUND: The cross-talk between UPR activation and metabolic stress remains largely unclear. RESULTS:Phenformin treatment activates the IRE1α and PERK pathways in an AMPK-dependent manner. CONCLUSION:AMPK is required for phenformin-mediated IRE1α and PERK activation. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings demonstrate the cross-talk between UPR and metabolic signals. Activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR) is associated with the disruption of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) homeostasis and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of many humanmetabolic diseases, including obesity and type 2 diabetes. However, the nature of the signals activating UPR under these conditions remains largely unknown. Using a method that we recently optimized to directly measure UPR sensor activation, we screened the effect of various metabolic drugs on UPR activation and show that the anti-diabetic drug phenformin activates UPR sensors IRE1α and pancreatic endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) in both an ER-dependent and ER-independent manner. Mechanistically, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation is required but not sufficient to initiate phenformin-mediated IRE1α and PERK activation, suggesting the involvement of additional factor(s). Interestingly, activation of the IRE1α (but not PERK) pathway is partially responsible for the cytotoxic effect of phenformin. Together, our data show the existence of a non-canonical UPR whose activation requires the cytosolic kinase AMPK, adding another layer of complexity to UPR activation upon metabolic stress.
Entities:
Keywords:
AMP-activated Protein Kinase (AMPK); Anti-diabetic Drug; Biguanide; Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress; Energy Metabolism; IRE1α; PERK; Signaling; Unfolded Protein Response
Authors: Claudio Hetz; Paula Bernasconi; Jill Fisher; Ann-Hwee Lee; Michael C Bassik; Bruno Antonsson; Gabriel S Brandt; Neal N Iwakoshi; Anna Schinzel; Laurie H Glimcher; Stanley J Korsmeyer Journal: Science Date: 2006-04-28 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Jonathan H Lin; Han Li; Douglas Yasumura; Hannah R Cohen; Chao Zhang; Barbara Panning; Kevan M Shokat; Matthew M Lavail; Peter Walter Journal: Science Date: 2007-11-09 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Hamsa Puthalakath; Lorraine A O'Reilly; Priscilla Gunn; Lily Lee; Priscilla N Kelly; Nicholas D Huntington; Peter D Hughes; Ewa M Michalak; Jennifer McKimm-Breschkin; Noburo Motoyama; Tomomi Gotoh; Shizuo Akira; Philippe Bouillet; Andreas Strasser Journal: Cell Date: 2007-06-29 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: X Z Wang; B Lawson; J W Brewer; H Zinszner; A Sanjay; L J Mi; R Boorstein; G Kreibich; L M Hendershot; D Ron Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: Alan Bolnick; Mohammed Abdulhasan; Brian Kilburn; Yufen Xie; Mindie Howard; Paul Andresen; Alexandra M Shamir; Jing Dai; Elizabeth E Puscheck; Daniel A Rappolee Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Fangfang Bi; Ziyan Jiang; Wonmin Park; Tobias M P Hartwich; Zhiping Ge; Kay Y Chong; Kevin Yang; Madeline J Morrison; Dongin Kim; Jaeyeon Kim; Wen Zhang; Liliia M Kril; David S Watt; Chunming Liu; Yang Yang-Hartwich Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2021-10-08 Impact factor: 6.009
Authors: Kristin Zimmermann; Johannes Baldinger; Barbara Mayerhofer; Atanas G Atanasov; Verena M Dirsch; Elke H Heiss Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2015-04-03 Impact factor: 7.376