Literature DB >> 23548286

Associations of risk factors with somatic cell count in bulk tank milk on organic and conventional dairy farms in the United States.

K M Cicconi-Hogan1, M Gamroth, R Richert, P L Ruegg, K E Stiglbauer, Y H Schukken.   

Abstract

In the past decade, the demand for organic agricultural products has increased rapidly in the United States and worldwide. Milk quality research is of major interest to both consumers and dairy farmers alike. However, scientific data on milk quality, herd management methods, and animal welfare on organic farms in the United States has been lacking before the research from this study. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of bulk tank milk somatic cell count (SCC) with management characteristics on organic and conventional dairy farms in New York, Oregon, and Wisconsin. Data from similarly sized organic farms (n=192), conventional nongrazing farms (n=64), and conventional grazing farms (n=36) were collected at a single farm visit. Of the 292 farms visited, 290 bulk tank milk samples were collected. Overall, no difference in SCC was observed between the conventional and organic grazing systems. Two models were created to assess the effects of various management and herd characteristics on the logarithmic transformation of the SCC (LSCC), one using data from all herds and one using data from organic herds only. From the total herd model, more grain fed per cow per day was negatively associated with LSCC, whereas a positive bulk tank culture for Staphylococcus aureus and years that a farmer reported being in the dairy business were both positively associated with LSCC. In the organic herd model, a seasonal effect indicated that LSCC tended to increase in the summer and decrease in the winter. Grain fed per cow per day, the use of anionic salts in transition-cow diets, the use of gloves during milking, and regular use of a quarantine unit at milking were all negatively associated with LSCC. Similar to the total herd model, a Staph. aureus-positive bulk tank culture was positively associated with LSCC in the organic model. Standard plate count was also positively associated with LSCC in the organic model. Several variables that were associated with management using external resources were combined to create an external input score. In the total herd model, use of more external resources was negatively associated with LSCC. Conventional herds in the study tended to use more outside management resources than organic herds.
Copyright © 2013 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23548286     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  5 in total

1.  Nicotinamide Riboside Is a Major NAD+ Precursor Vitamin in Cow Milk.

Authors:  Samuel Aj Trammell; Liping Yu; Philip Redpath; Marie E Migaud; Charles Brenner
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Dairy Tool Box Talks: A Comprehensive Worker Training in Dairy Farming.

Authors:  Maristela Rovai; Heidi Carroll; Rebecca Foos; Tracey Erickson; Alvaro Garcia
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2016-07-15

3.  Bacteriological etiology and treatment of mastitis in Finnish dairy herds.

Authors:  Johanna Vakkamäki; Suvi Taponen; Anna-Maija Heikkilä; Satu Pyörälä
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 1.695

4.  Prevalence of Bovine Mastitis Pathogens in Bulk Tank Milk in China.

Authors:  Yanliang Bi; Ya Jing Wang; Yun Qin; Roger Guix Vallverdú; Jaime Maldonado García; Wei Sun; Shengli Li; Zhijun Cao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Prevalence and Comparing of Some Microbiological Properties, Somatic Cell Count and Antibiotic Residue of Organic and Conventional Raw Milk Produced in Turkey.

Authors:  Bayram Ürkek; Mustafa Şengül; Tuba Erkaya; Vecihi Aksakal
Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2017-04-30       Impact factor: 2.622

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.