Literature DB >> 23548224

Prognosis for advanced-stage primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma and serous ovarian cancer in Taiwan.

Kuan-Chong Chao1, Yi-Jen Chen, Chi-Mou Juang, Hei-Yu Lau, Kuo-Chang Wen, Pi-Lin Sung, Feng-Ying Fang, Nae-Fang Twu, Ming-Shyen Yen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prognosis of patients with advanced-stage primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma (PSPC) or papillary serous ovarian cancer (PSOC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study and included two study groups: one with stage III/IV PSPC (n = 38) patients and the other with PSOC (n = 53) patients. Patients were matched for histologic subtype (serous tumor), tumor stage, tumor grade, residual disease at the end of debulking surgery (primary or interval), and age (±5 years).
RESULTS: Mean age was significantly greater for patients with PSPC (63.03 ± 11.88 years) than for patients with PSOC (55.92 ± 12.56 years, p = 0.008). Optimal debulking surgery was performed initially in 71.9% of PSPC patients and 66.0% of PSOC patients. In addition, 93.9% of PSPC patients and 92.3% of PSOC patients were treated with platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy. The frequency of high-grade tumors was significantly higher in the PSPC (100%) than in the PSOC group (68.3%; p < 0.001). Progression-free survival (PFS) was similar in the PSPC [median 12 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.3-16.7] and PSOC groups (median 16.7 months, 95% CI 12.9-20.4; p = 0.470). Overall survival was shorter in the PSPC (median 62 months, 95% CI 19.6-104.4) than in the PSOC group (median 77.5 months, 95% CI 69.7-85.2; p = 0.006, log-rank statistic).
CONCLUSION: PFS was similar for advanced-stage PSPC and PSOC patients. Since the PSPC patients tended to be older and have more high-grade tumors, OS was shorter for PSPC than for POSC patients. Thus, management of the two types of cancer should not differ.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23548224     DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2012.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1028-4559            Impact factor:   1.705


  5 in total

Review 1.  When is it safe to omit surgery in primary peritoneal cancer with small volume disease?

Authors:  Rachel Pounds; Sean Kehoe
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Ascites regression following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in prediction of treatment outcome among stage IIIc to IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Xia Xu; Fei Deng; Mengmeng Lv; Binhui Ren; Wenwen Guo; Xiaoxiang Chen
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 4.234

3.  Clinical characteristics and survival of patients with normal-sized ovarian carcinoma syndrome: Retrospective analysis of a single institution 10-year experiment.

Authors:  Nan Yu; Xi Li; Bin Yang; Jing Chen; Ming-Fu Wu; Jun-Cheng Wei; Ke-Zhen Li
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 4.  Narrative review on serous primary peritoneal carcinoma of unknown primary site: four questions to be answered.

Authors:  Elie Rassy; Tarek Assi; Stergios Boussios; Joseph Kattan; Julie Smith-Gagen; Nicholas Pavlidis
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-12

5.  Epigenomic Profiling of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Stem-Cell Differentiation Reveals GPD1 Associated Immune Suppressive Microenvironment and Poor Prognosis.

Authors:  Lin-Yu Chen; Rui-Lan Huang; Po-Hsuan Su; Ling-Hui Chu; Yu-Chun Weng; Hui-Chen Wang; Hung-Cheng Lai; Kuo-Chang Wen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.