Literature DB >> 23547058

From EPSDT to EHBs: the future of pediatric coverage design under government financed health insurance.

Melissa M Goldstein1, Sara Rosenbaum.   

Abstract

We review the evolution of federal financing for child health care over the past 40 years. The Social Security Amendments of 1967 established the program of early and periodic screening, diagnosis and treatment (EPSDT) as a required Medicaid benefit. The EPSDT amendments directed agencies to cover "early and periodic" screening and diagnostic services to ascertain "defects" and "chronic conditions" in children, as well as health care and treatment needed to "correct or ameliorate" such defects and conditions discovered during the screening examinations. The 1997 enactment of the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) shifted federal policy from the use of an early coverage standard to one that gives insurers much more discretion to define medical necessity and coverage exclusions. CHIP programs offer coverage that is narrower than the benefits available under Medicaid. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires significantly more classes of care to be covered than does CHIP but well below the level of coverage under Medicaid. Implementation of the ACA to date suggests that the US Department of Health and Human Services will only demand pediatric coverage pegged to the commercial insurance market standards, rather than Medicaid's unique pediatric coverage standard. Although EPSDT's emphasis on early, developmental, and ameliorative services might result in more comprehensive benefits for children, particularly those with special health needs, one might still describe the ACA coverage as providing a basic, minimal level of services from a distributive justice perspective. It may, however, vary from state to state. States have the authority to decide whether to use an EPSDT-style approach or to follow the more restrictive approach of commercial insurance plans. Advocacy at the state level will determine which approach different states take.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23547058     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-0252e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  6 in total

1.  Children's health care and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: what's at stake?

Authors:  Eileen K Fry-Bowers; William Nicholas; Neal Halfon
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 16.193

2.  "Pay for Success" Financing and Home-Based Multicomponent Childhood Asthma Interventions: Modeling Results From the Detroit Medicaid Population.

Authors:  Paula M Lantz; George Miller; Corwin N Rhyan; Sara Rosenbaum; Leighton Ku; Samantha Iovan
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and children and youth with special health care needs.

Authors:  Heidi M Feldman; Christina A Buysse; Lauren M Hubner; Lynne C Huffman; Irene M Loe
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.225

4.  Vision and eye health in children 36 to <72 months: proposed data definitions.

Authors:  Wendy L Marsh-Tootle; Shirley A Russ; Michael X Repka
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Enforcing Legal Compliance for Covering of Services Promoting Family Mental Health.

Authors:  Nathaniel Z Counts; Leslie R Walker-Harding; Benjamin F Miller
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 6.604

Review 6.  Medicaid's EPSDT Benefit: An Opportunity to Improve Pediatric Screening for Social Determinants of Health.

Authors:  Nisha A Malhotra; Ann Nevar; Ruqaiijah Yearby; Lawrence C Kleinman; Sarah D Ronis
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 3.929

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.