Literature DB >> 23546552

Trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality in the United States: implications for prevention.

Adetunji T Toriola1, Graham A Colditz.   

Abstract

While debate continues regarding short-term changes in breast cancer incidence and the impact of screening on mortality, a long-term view of trends in incidence and mortality may better inform our understanding of the changing patterns of disease and ultimately guide in population-based prevention. Although many factors have influenced breast cancer incidence over the past seven decades, some have played more prominent roles at various times. Changing reproductive patterns, greater longevity, and post-menopausal hormone (estrogen + progesterone) were important in the steady increase before 1980, while mammographic screening, probably in conjunction with escalating combined estrogen + progesterone use, played dominant roles in the post-1980 surge. Accruing evidence also indicates that the rapid drop in 2003 was mostly due to a sharp decline in estrogen + progesterone use. The most paradoxical observation relates to the divergence in incidence and mortality trends most noticeable when mortality rates started to decline shortly after the surge in incidence rates started in 1980. In addition to the dynamic changes in risk factor profiles, the divergence reflects wider uptake of screening mammography, better characterization of tumor biology, and improvements in treatment. The rise in incidence rates over the past three decades is due to an increase in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) tumors, which respond favorably to treatment. On the other hand, the incidence of estrogen receptor negative (ER-) tumors, which respond poorly to hormonal therapy, has been decreasing for almost three decades. Furthermore, widespread adoption of screening mammography has led to tumors being diagnosed at earlier stages when treatment is effective and advances in treatment have ensured adoption of targeted and better tolerated therapies. To achieve long-term success in the primary prevention of breast cancer, a greater understanding of factors responsible for the decrease in ER- tumors is essential. In addition, improving the sensitivity of breast cancer screening to facilitate earlier detection of tumors with very aggressive phenotypes would go a long way in bridging the divergence between incidence and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23546552     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2500-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  33 in total

1.  Budget impact analysis of a breast rapid diagnostic unit.

Authors:  M Elmi; H Hussein; S Nofech-Mozes; B Curpen; A Leahey; N Look Hong
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Estrogen Receptor Status and the Future Burden of Invasive and In Situ Breast Cancers in the United States.

Authors:  Philip S Rosenberg; Kimberly A Barker; William F Anderson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Intra-arterial interventional therapy for inoperable local advanced breast cancer: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Jing Ma; Jin Song; Hai Chen; Cibo Fan; Jiaqi Xie; Xiaodong Qi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 4.  How many etiological subtypes of breast cancer: two, three, four, or more?

Authors:  William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Aleix Prat; Charles M Perou; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Trends and Patterns of Disparities in Cancer Mortality Among US Counties, 1980-2014.

Authors:  Ali H Mokdad; Laura Dwyer-Lindgren; Christina Fitzmaurice; Rebecca W Stubbs; Amelia Bertozzi-Villa; Chloe Morozoff; Raghid Charara; Christine Allen; Mohsen Naghavi; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Comprehensive evaluation of the incidence of late effects in 5-year survivors of breast cancer.

Authors:  Timothy L Lash; Soe Soe Thwin; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Ann M Geiger; Jaclyn Bosco; Virginia P Quinn; Terry S Field; Pamala A Pawloski; Rebecca A Silliman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status.

Authors:  Nadia Howlader; Sean F Altekruse; Christopher I Li; Vivien W Chen; Christina A Clarke; Lynn A G Ries; Kathleen A Cronin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  High prevalence of luminal B breast cancer intrinsic subtype in Colombian women.

Authors:  Silvia Juliana Serrano-Gomez; Maria Carolina Sanabria-Salas; Gustavo Hernández-Suarez; Oscar García; Camilo Silva; Alejandro Romero; Juan Carlos Mejía; Lucio Miele; Laura Fejerman; Jovanny Zabaleta
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 9.  Breast Cancer in Latinas: A Focus on Intrinsic Subtypes Distribution.

Authors:  Silvia J Serrano-Gómez; Laura Fejerman; Jovanny Zabaleta
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Cancer Incidence and Survival Trends by Subtype Using Data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program, 1992-2013.

Authors:  Anne-Michelle Noone; Kathleen A Cronin; Sean F Altekruse; Nadia Howlader; Denise R Lewis; Valentina I Petkov; Lynne Penberthy
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.