BACKGROUND: The shortage of organs is a limitation for transplantation, making the care of potential organ donors an important issue. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out to assess the efficacy of interventions to stabilize hemodynamics in brain-dead donors or to improve organ function and outcomes of transplantation. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched. Of 5096 articles retrieved, 39 randomized controlled trials were selected. Twenty were included in a qualitative synthesis, providing data on 1277 patients. The main interventions described were desmopressin use, triiodothyronine and methylprednisolone replacement, fluid management, vasopressor therapy, mechanical ventilation strategies, and surgical techniques. RESULTS: Three meta-analyses were conducted: the first included two studies and showed that desmopressin administered to brain-dead patients was not advantageous with respect to early organ function in kidney recipients (relative risk, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-1.10; I(2) = 0%; P = 0.809). The second included four studies and showed that triiodothyronine did not add hemodynamic benefits versus standard management (weighted mean difference, 0.15; 95% CI, -0.13 to 0.42; I(2) = 17.4%; P = 0.304). The third meta-analysis (two studies) showed that ischemic liver preconditioning during harvesting procedures did not benefit survival (relative risk, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.93-1.08; I(2) = 0%; P = 0.459). CONCLUSION: The present results suggest limited efficacy of interventions focusing on the management of brain-dead donors.
BACKGROUND: The shortage of organs is a limitation for transplantation, making the care of potential organ donors an important issue. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out to assess the efficacy of interventions to stabilize hemodynamics in brain-dead donors or to improve organ function and outcomes of transplantation. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched. Of 5096 articles retrieved, 39 randomized controlled trials were selected. Twenty were included in a qualitative synthesis, providing data on 1277 patients. The main interventions described were desmopressin use, triiodothyronine and methylprednisolone replacement, fluid management, vasopressor therapy, mechanical ventilation strategies, and surgical techniques. RESULTS: Three meta-analyses were conducted: the first included two studies and showed that desmopressin administered to brain-dead patients was not advantageous with respect to early organ function in kidney recipients (relative risk, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-1.10; I(2) = 0%; P = 0.809). The second included four studies and showed that triiodothyronine did not add hemodynamic benefits versus standard management (weighted mean difference, 0.15; 95% CI, -0.13 to 0.42; I(2) = 17.4%; P = 0.304). The third meta-analysis (two studies) showed that ischemic liver preconditioning during harvesting procedures did not benefit survival (relative risk, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.93-1.08; I(2) = 0%; P = 0.459). CONCLUSION: The present results suggest limited efficacy of interventions focusing on the management of brain-dead donors.
Authors: Juan S Danobeitia; Matthew S Hanson; Peter Chlebeck; Elisa Park; Jamie M Sperger; Alice Schwarznau; Luis A Fernandez Journal: Cell Transplant Date: 2014-04-22 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Rolando A Rebolledo; Anne C Van Erp; Petra J Ottens; Janneke Wiersema-Buist; Henri G D Leuvenink; Pamela Romanque Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rolando A Rebolledo; Bo Liu; Mohammed Z Akhtar; Petra J Ottens; Jian-Ning Zhang; Rutger J Ploeg; Henri G D Leuvenink Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-05-19 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: A C Van Erp; R A Rebolledo; D Hoeksma; N R Jespersen; P J Ottens; R Nørregaard; M Pedersen; C Laustsen; J G M Burgerhof; J C Wolters; J Ciapaite; H E Bøtker; H G D Leuvenink; B Jespersen Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Rolando Rebolledo; Bo Liu; Mohammed Z Akhtar; Petra J Ottens; Jian-ning Zhang; Rutger J Ploeg; Henri G D Leuvenink Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2014-05-02 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Juan S Danobeitia; Peter J Chlebeck; Inna Shokolenko; Xiaobo Ma; Glenn Wilson; Luis A Fernandez Journal: Cell Transplant Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 4.064