Literature DB >> 23543878

Orthodontic Camouflage Treatment in an Adult Patient with a Class II, Division 1 Malocclusion - A Case Report.

Appasaheb Naragond1, Smitha Kenganal, Roshan Sagarkar.   

Abstract

Since so many decades, various treatment modalities have been presented for the treatment for the class II, div 1 malocclusions. In recent times, we have seen enormously increasing numbers of young adults who desire the shortest, cost effective and a non surgical correction of Class II malocclusions and they accept dental camouflage as a treatment option to mask the skeletal discrepancy. This case report presents one such case of a 22 year old non-growing female who had a skeletal Class II, division 1 malocclusion with an orthognathic maxilla, a retrognathic mandible, a negative VTO and an overjet of 12mm, who did not want a surgical treatment. We considered the camouflage treatment by extracting the upper first premolars. Following the treatment, a satisfactory result was achieved with an ideal, static and a functional occlusion, facial profile, smile and lip competence and stability of the treatment results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Class II div 1 malocclusion; Orthodontic camouflage

Year:  2012        PMID: 23543878      PMCID: PMC3592324          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5191.2780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  23 in total

1.  The influence of extraction orthodontic treatment on craniofacial structures: evaluation according to two different factors.

Authors:  L Taner-Sarisoy; N Darendeliler
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects.

Authors:  Faruk Ayhan Basciftci; Serdar Usumez
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in "borderline" Class II patients.

Authors:  D E Paquette; J R Beattie; L E Johnston
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  The effect of maxillary first premolar extraction and incisor retraction on mandibular position: testing the central dogma of "functional orthodontics".

Authors:  P E Luecke; L E Johnston
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  A comparison of outcomes of orthodontic and surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion in adults.

Authors:  W R Proffit; C Phillips; N Douvartzidis
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Nonextraction treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusions.

Authors:  M G Arvystas
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1985-11

7.  Upper lip changes correlated to maxillary incisor retraction--a metallic implant study.

Authors:  Adilson Luiz Ramos; Maurício Tatsuei Sakima; Ary dos Santos Pinto; S Jay Bowman
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 8.  Treatment planning considerations for adult patients.

Authors:  A J Kuhlberg; E Glynn
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  1997-01

9.  Differential diagnosis and treatment planning for the adult nonsurgical orthodontic patient.

Authors:  R G Alexander; P M Sinclair; L J Goates
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1986-02

10.  Lip curve changes in females with premolar extraction or nonextraction treatment.

Authors:  Kylie P Moseling; Michael G Woods
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.