| Literature DB >> 23543825 |
Vikas Yadav Patade1, Deepti Khatri, Maya Kumari, Atul Grover, Sanjay Mohan Gupta, Zakwan Ahmed.
Abstract
Our containment trials have established cold tolerance in Nicotiana tabacum osmotin (Nt Osm) transgenic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Pusa Ruby). Though, the stress tolerance mechanisms have been studied at physio-biochemical levels, molecular mechanisms underlying the tolerant response are still not well studied. Therefore, quantitative transcript expression of Osmotin and other stress responsive genes (CBF1, P5CS and APX) was studied in response to cold (4°C; 2 and 24 h) treatment in the transgenic and wild type tomato plants. The expression analysis revealed differential transcript regulation in the transgenic and wild type plants on the cold exposure. In general, the genes were either earlier induced or the extent of fold change in transcript expression over the respective untreated controls was higher in transgenic than in the wild type plants on cold exposure. The transcript expression data also supported the metabolite analysis on free Proline and ascorbate content. The results thus suggest that constitutive over expression of the Osmotin modulate transcript abundance and functional expression products of the other stress responsive genes thereby, imparting cold tolerance in the transgenic tomato plants.Entities:
Keywords: Ascorbate; Cold stress; Free Proline; Osmotin; Transcript expression; Transgenic tomato; qRT PCR
Year: 2013 PMID: 23543825 PMCID: PMC3610025 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Figure 1Transcript expression analysis of(Figure1A),(Figure1B),(Figure1C) and(Figure1D) in transgenic and wild type tomato plants exposed to cold treatment. Plants at 90 days after transplanting were exposed to cold treatment for 2 and 24h and transcript expression was studied in leaves. The values are means (n = 4) fold expression over respective untreated control. Error bars indicate SE. The mean values in one series indicated by different letters are statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05) according to LSD test.
Figure 2Effect of cold exposure on Proline accumulation in transgenic and wild type tomato plants exposed to cold treatment. Plants at 90 days after transplanting were exposed to cold treatment for 2 and 24 h and proline accumulation was studied in leaves. The values are mean (n = 4) fold Proline accumulation over the respective untreated controls. Error bars indicate SE. The mean values in one series indicated by different letters are statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05) according to LSD test.
Figure 3Effect of cold exposure on ascorbate content in transgenic and wild type tomato plants exposed to cold treatment. Plants at 90 days after transplanting were exposed to cold treatment for 2 and 24 h and ascorbate content was analyzed in leaves. The values are mean (n = 4) fold ascorbate content over the respective untreated control. Error bars indicate SE. The mean values in one series indicated by different letters are statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05) according to LSD test.
Summary of transcript regulation of genes over the respective untreated controls
| Gene | Transcript regulation on cold exposure over the respective untreated controls | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 h | 24 h | |||
| Wild type | Transgenic | Wild type | Transgenic | |
| Downb | Upa | Downc | Downc | |
| Upa | Upa | Unchangedb | Upb | |
| Downb | Upa | Downc | Unchangedb | |
| Unchangedb | Upa | Upa | Upb | |
The transgenic and wild type tomato plants were exposed to cold treatment for 2 and 24 h. The significant (P ≤ 0.05) differences in transcript regulation (up, down or unchanged) among the cold and control treatments are marked with different letters.
Primers designed for transcript expression analysis of stress responsive genes
| Sr. No. | Primer Id | GenBank Accession No. | Forward Primer (5’-3’) | Reverse Primer (5’-3’) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | X61679.1 | AATGCGCCACGAGGTACTAA | AGGACTCCACCACAGTCACC | |
| 2. | AY368483.1 | GGCTAATGTTACCACCACCTCAA | CAATAATTCGCACCATACCCAAA | |
| 3. | NM_001246978.1 | TGCACTGGAAGCAAATGAAA | CCATCAGCAATCTCCGTTCT | |
| 4. | X81376.1 | CCTCTTATGCTCCGTCTTGC | CTCCAGTCACCTCAACAGCA | |
| 5. | BG130735.1 | AGGGACTACGGCCTTTTAGG | CAGAAGGGGACAATTTCAAAGA |