PURPOSE: Data regarding the implementation of state-of-the-art methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) control procedures in Italy are lacking. There is a need to evaluate compliance with MRSA recommendations (CR) in Italian hospitals. METHODS: A 67-question closed-answer survey was sent to all Italian hospitals, in order to analyze and evaluate program consistency with CR [hand hygiene (HH), contact precautions, screening of high-risk patients, decolonization, feedback on surveillance data, and antimicrobial guidelines and education programs]. RESULTS: 205 hospitals, which account for 42 % of national admissions, returned questionnaires. 131 hospitals (64 %) did not have written MRSA control guidelines. Hospitals reported the following levels of compliance with CR: (1) HH: 67 hospitals (33 %); (2) contact precautions: 33 (16 %); (3) MRSA screening: 66 (32 %); (4) MRSA decolonization: 42 (20 %); (5) surveillance data feedback: 87 (43 %); and (6) antimicrobial guidelines and education programs: 41 (20 %). One hospital (0.5 % of responses) had implemented all recommendations and 28 hospitals (14 %) had implemented four or five recommendations. 31 % of hospitals surveyed had implemented none. Multivariate analysis showed that the only factor identified as being associated with the implementation of MRSA control recommendations was the number of meetings/year of the infection control team (ICT) (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Written MRSA control guidelines are available in only one-third of Italian facilities. An organized system, with ≥4 interventions, has been implemented in just 1 out of 7 hospitals. HH programs and ICT activity are related to better MRSA control. In Italy, there is significant opportunity for improvement in MRSA control.
PURPOSE: Data regarding the implementation of state-of-the-art methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) control procedures in Italy are lacking. There is a need to evaluate compliance with MRSA recommendations (CR) in Italian hospitals. METHODS: A 67-question closed-answer survey was sent to all Italian hospitals, in order to analyze and evaluate program consistency with CR [hand hygiene (HH), contact precautions, screening of high-risk patients, decolonization, feedback on surveillance data, and antimicrobial guidelines and education programs]. RESULTS: 205 hospitals, which account for 42 % of national admissions, returned questionnaires. 131 hospitals (64 %) did not have written MRSA control guidelines. Hospitals reported the following levels of compliance with CR: (1) HH: 67 hospitals (33 %); (2) contact precautions: 33 (16 %); (3) MRSA screening: 66 (32 %); (4) MRSA decolonization: 42 (20 %); (5) surveillance data feedback: 87 (43 %); and (6) antimicrobial guidelines and education programs: 41 (20 %). One hospital (0.5 % of responses) had implemented all recommendations and 28 hospitals (14 %) had implemented four or five recommendations. 31 % of hospitals surveyed had implemented none. Multivariate analysis showed that the only factor identified as being associated with the implementation of MRSA control recommendations was the number of meetings/year of the infection control team (ICT) (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Written MRSA control guidelines are available in only one-third of Italian facilities. An organized system, with ≥4 interventions, has been implemented in just 1 out of 7 hospitals. HH programs and ICT activity are related to better MRSA control. In Italy, there is significant opportunity for improvement in MRSA control.
Authors: Carlene A Muto; John A Jernigan; Belinda E Ostrowsky; Hervé M Richet; William R Jarvis; John M Boyce; Barry M Farr Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Timothy H Dellit; Robert C Owens; John E McGowan; Dale N Gerding; Robert A Weinstein; John P Burke; W Charles Huskins; David L Paterson; Neil O Fishman; Christopher F Carpenter; P J Brennan; Marianne Billeter; Thomas M Hooton Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2006-12-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: David P Calfee; Cassandra D Salgado; David Classen; Kathleen M Arias; Kelly Podgorny; Deverick J Anderson; Helen Burstin; Susan E Coffin; Erik R Dubberke; Victoria Fraser; Dale N Gerding; Frances A Griffin; Peter Gross; Keith S Kaye; Michael Klompas; Evelyn Lo; Jonas Marschall; Leonard A Mermel; Lindsay Nicolle; David A Pegues; Trish M Perl; Sanjay Saint; Robert A Weinstein; Robert Wise; Deborah S Yokoe Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Heidi S M Ammerlaan; Jan A J W Kluytmans; Hanneke Berkhout; Anton Buiting; Els I G B de Brauwer; Peterhans J van den Broek; Paula van Gelderen; Sander A C A P Leenders; Alewijn Ott; Clemens Richter; Lodewijk Spanjaard; Ingrid J B Spijkerman; Frank H van Tiel; G Paul Voorn; Mireille W H Wulf; Jan van Zeijl; Annet Troelstra; Marc J M Bonten Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: J E Coia; G J Duckworth; D I Edwards; M Farrington; C Fry; H Humphreys; C Mallaghan; D R Tucker Journal: J Hosp Infect Date: 2006-04-03 Impact factor: 3.926
Authors: Dennis Souverein; Patricia Houtman; Sjoerd M Euser; Bjorn L Herpers; Jan Kluytmans; Jeroen W Den Boer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-05 Impact factor: 3.240