Prospective study comparing the new sclerotherapy and hemorrhoidectomy in terms of therapeutic outcomes at 4 years after the treatment.

PURPOSE: Recently, sclerotherapy using a new sclerosing agent (aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid) has become widespread in Japan as a treatment for hemorrhoids. In the present study, we investigated whether sclerotherapy or surgical therapy (hemorrhoidectomy) is superior in terms of the therapeutic outcomes at 4 years.
METHODS: We sent a questionnaire on symptoms and the degree of satisfaction to patients who underwent sclerotherapy or hemorrhoidectomy for grade 3 or 4 hemorrhoids in 2007, and compared the two therapies based on the responses, with respect to superiority of the therapeutic outcomes at 4 years. To identify the factors affecting the symptom-free and satisfaction rates, the univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for the following seven parameters: age, sex, degree of hemorrhoids, presence of external hemorrhoids, past history of treatment for hemorrhoids, number of hemorrhoids treated and the type of treatment.
RESULTS: Overall, 75 % of the patients (195/260) responded to the questionnaire. In this study, the symptom-free rates were 53 % (30/57 patients) in the sclerotherapy group and 80 % (111/138 patients) in the hemorrhoidectomy group, and the satisfaction rates were 70 % (40/57 patients) in the sclerotherapy group and 88 % (121/138 patients) in the hemorrhoidectomy group. The results revealed that the type of treatment was the only factor affecting these two outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that hemorrhoidectomy is superior to sclerotherapy. These findings may be useful in the treatment of hemorrhoid patients.