Literature DB >> 23542967

Attitudes and experience of Dutch general practitioners regarding computerized clinical decision support.

Stephanie Medlock1, Saeid Eslami, Marjan Askari, Henk J Brouwer, Henk C van Weert, Sophia E de Rooij, Ameen Abu-Hanna.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Dutch general practices have a high adoption rate for computerized patient records and clinical decision support. We sought to measure the attitudes and experience of Dutch general practitioners towards clinical decision support.
METHODS: A preliminary survey was created based on questions from published surveys, modified with the results of interviews. The final web-based survey was administered to 43 general practitioners in a practice area where a decision support implementation is planned.
RESULTS: Thirty general practitioners (70%) completed the survey. Most felt that decision support is a good idea (23/30), although fewer reported positive experience with decision support (10/30). Participants were supportive of rules and guidelines, but commonly had the sense that there were too many alerts.
CONCLUSION: Dutch clinicians are positive about decision support, but future efforts should try to reduce the perception of overload, for example by ensuring that alerts are relevant and choosing less interruptive forms of notification for less severe alerts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23542967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  4 in total

1.  Acceptance and barriers pertaining to a general practice decision support system for multiple clinical conditions: A mixed methods evaluation.

Authors:  Derk L Arts; Stephanie K Medlock; Henk C P M van Weert; Jeremy C Wyatt; Ameen Abu-Hanna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  For which clinical rules do doctors want decision support, and why? A survey of Dutch general practitioners.

Authors:  Stephanie Medlock; Saeid Eslami; Marjan Askari; Derk L Arts; Esther M van de Glind; Henk J Brouwer; Henk C van Weert; Sophia E de Rooij; Ameen Abu-Hanna
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  From assessment to improvement of elderly care in general practice using decision support to increase adherence to ACOVE quality indicators: study protocol for randomized control trial.

Authors:  Saeid Eslami; Marjan Askari; Stephanie Medlock; Derk L Arts; Jeremy C Wyatt; Henk C P M van Weert; Sophia E de Rooij; Ameen Abu-Hanna
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 4.  Clinical assessment of patients with chest pain; a systematic review of predictive tools.

Authors:  Luis Ayerbe; Esteban González; Valentina Gallo; Claire L Coleman; Andrew Wragg; John Robson
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.298

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.