Literature DB >> 23542925

Electrochemical removal of metallic implants from Technovit 9100 New embedded hard and soft tissues prior to histological sectioning.

Elmar Willbold1, Mattias Reebmann, Richard Jeffries, Frank Witte.   

Abstract

Solid metallic implants in soft or hard tissues are serious challenges for histological processing. However, metallic implants are more frequently used in e.g. cardiovascular or orthopaedic therapies. Before clinical use, these devices need to be tested thoroughly in a biological environment and histological analysis of their biocompatibility is a major requirement. To allow the histological analysis of metallic implants in tissues especially in calcified hard tissues, we describe a method for embedding these tissues in the resin Technovit 9100 New and removing the metallic implants by electrochemical dissolution. With the combination of these two processes, we are able to achieve 5 μm thick sections from soft or hard tissues with a superior preservation of tissue architecture and especially the implant-tissue interface. These sections can be stained by classical stainings, immunohistochemical and enzymehistochemical as well as DNA-based staining methods.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23542925     DOI: 10.1007/s00418-013-1089-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol        ISSN: 0948-6143            Impact factor:   4.304


  14 in total

1.  Biodegradable magnesium scaffolds: Part 1: appropriate inflammatory response.

Authors:  F Witte; H Ulrich; M Rudert; E Willbold
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 4.396

2.  An immunofluorescence method for postembedded tissue in the acrylic resin Technovit 9100 New using fluorescein isothiocyanate secondary detection.

Authors:  Sim K Singhrao; Carsten T Müller; Sophie J Gilbert; Victor C Duance; Charles W Archer
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.769

Review 3.  On the mechanisms of biocompatibility.

Authors:  David F Williams
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Biocompatibility of implants: lymphocyte/macrophage interactions.

Authors:  James M Anderson; Amy K McNally
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 9.623

5.  A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Säge-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique.

Authors:  K Donath; G Breuner
Journal:  J Oral Pathol       Date:  1982-08

6.  Improved sensitivity for high resolution in situ hybridization using resin extraction of methyl methacrylate embedded material.

Authors:  C Saito; M Hayashi; A Sakai; M Fujie; H Kuroiwa; T Kuroiwa
Journal:  Biotech Histochem       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  Immunohistochemical comparison of differentiation markers on paraffin and plastic embedded human bone samples.

Authors:  G Wittenburg; C Volkel; R Mai; G Lauer
Journal:  J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.011

8.  A transmission electron microscopy examination of the interface between osteoblasts and metal biomaterials.

Authors:  B T Garvey; R Bizios
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1995-08

9.  Immunohistochemistry of matrix markers in Technovit 9100 New-embedded undecalcified bone sections.

Authors:  R Yang; C M Davies; C W Archer; R G Richards
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2003-12-31       Impact factor: 3.942

10.  Magnesium hydroxide temporarily enhancing osteoblast activity and decreasing the osteoclast number in peri-implant bone remodelling.

Authors:  C Janning; E Willbold; C Vogt; J Nellesen; A Meyer-Lindenberg; H Windhagen; F Thorey; F Witte
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 8.947

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Histochem Cell Biol conspectus: the year 2013 in review.

Authors:  Douglas J Taatjes; Jürgen Roth
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 4.304

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.