Literature DB >> 23542586

Mesenchymal bone marrow stem cells within polyglycolic acid tube observed in vivo after six weeks enhance facial nerve regeneration.

Heloisa Juliana Zabeu Rossi Costa1, Ricardo Ferreira Bento, Raquel Salomone, Deborah Azzi-Nogueira, Daniela B Zanatta, Márcio Paulino Costa, Ciro Ferreira da Silva, Bryan E Strauss, Luciana A Haddad.   

Abstract

Autografting is the gold-standard method for facial nerve repair with tissue loss. Its association with high-quality scaffolds and cell implants has disclosed distinct experimental outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional and histological effects of bone marrow stem cells (BMSC) combined with polyglycolic acid tube (PGAt) in autografted rat facial nerves. After neurotmesis of the mandibular branch of the rat facial nerve, surgical repair consisted of nerve autografting (groups A-E) contained in pGAT (groups B-E), filled with basement membrane matrix (groups C-E) with undifferentiated BMSC (group D) or Schwann-like cells that had differentiated from BMSC (group E). Axon morphometrics and an objective compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) analysis were conducted. Immunofluorescence assays were carried out with Schwann cell marker S100 and anti-β-galactosidase to label exogenous cells. Six weeks after surgery, animals from either cell-containing group had mean CMAP amplitudes significantly higher than control groups. Differently from other groups, facial nerves with Schwann-like cell implants had mean axonal densities within reference values. This same group had the highest mean axonal diameter in distal segments. We observed expression of the reporter gene lacZ in nerve cells in the graft and distally from it in groups D and E. Group-E cells had lacZ coexpressed with S100. In conclusion, regeneration of the facial nerve was improved by BMSC within PGAt in rats, yet Schwann-like cells were associated with superior effects. Accordingly, groups D and E had BMSC integrated in neural tissue with maintenance of former cell phenotype for six weeks.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23542586     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.03.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  15 in total

Review 1.  Augmenting peripheral nerve regeneration using stem cells: A review of current opinion.

Authors:  Neil G Fairbairn; Amanda M Meppelink; Joanna Ng-Glazier; Mark A Randolph; Jonathan M Winograd
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 2.  Advances and clinical challenges for translating nerve conduit technology from bench to bed side for peripheral nerve repair.

Authors:  Poonam Meena; Anupama Kakkar; Mukesh Kumar; Nitin Khatri; Rakesh Kumar Nagar; Aarti Singh; Poonam Malhotra; Manish Shukla; Sumit Kumar Saraswat; Supriya Srivastava; Rajan Datt; Siddharth Pandey
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 5.249

3.  [Effect of the local application of stem cells on repairing facial nerve defects: a systematic review].

Authors:  Dan Zhao; Yue-Heng Li; Zheng-Yan Yang; Ting Cai; Xiao-Yan Wu; Yu Xia; Zhi Zhou
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-01

4.  Role of stem cells-based in facial nerve reanimation: A meta-analysis of histological and neurophysiological outcomes.

Authors:  Luca Ricciardi; Resi Pucci; Amedeo Piazza; Giorgio Lofrese; Alba Scerrati; Nicola Montemurro; Antonino Raco; Massimo Miscusi; Tamara Ius; Marco Zeppieri
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 5.247

Review 5.  Neurotrauma and mesenchymal stem cells treatment: From experimental studies to clinical trials.

Authors:  Ana Maria Blanco Martinez; Camila de Oliveira Goulart; Bruna Dos Santos Ramalho; Júlia Teixeira Oliveira; Fernanda Martins Almeida
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 5.326

6.  Disparate Response to Methotrexate in Stem Versus Non-Stem Cells.

Authors:  Olivia S Beane; Louise E O Darling; Vera C Fonseca; Eric M Darling
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 7.  Facial Nerve Repair: Bioengineering Approaches in Preclinical Models.

Authors:  Fuat Baris Bengur; Conrad Stoy; Mary A Binko; Wayne Vincent Nerone; Caroline Nadia Fedor; Mario G Solari; Kacey G Marra
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 7.376

8.  Reconstruction of Multiple Facial Nerve Branches Using Skeletal Muscle-Derived Multipotent Stem Cell Sheet-Pellet Transplantation.

Authors:  Kosuke Saito; Tetsuro Tamaki; Maki Hirata; Hiroyuki Hashimoto; Kenei Nakazato; Nobuyuki Nakajima; Akihito Kazuno; Akihiro Sakai; Masahiro Iida; Kenji Okami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Dual Inhibition of Activin/Nodal/TGF-β and BMP Signaling Pathways by SB431542 and Dorsomorphin Induces Neuronal Differentiation of Human Adipose Derived Stem Cells.

Authors:  Vedavathi Madhu; Abhijit S Dighe; Quanjun Cui; D Nicole Deal
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2015-12-20       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 10.  Peripheral nerve conduits: technology update.

Authors:  D Arslantunali; T Dursun; D Yucel; N Hasirci; V Hasirci
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.