Literature DB >> 23542023

The recent reversal of the growth trend in MRI: a harbinger of the future?

Richard E Sharpe1, David C Levin, Laurence Parker, Vijay M Rao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Diagnostic imaging services have been repeatedly targeted as a source of excess health care expenditure. In particular, MRI is considered a high-tech and high-cost imaging service that saw rapid increases in utilization in the early 2000s. However, the most recent trends in the utilization of MR are not known. The aim of this study was to quantify trends in MR utilization overall and by body system from 1998 to 2010 in the Medicare population.
METHODS: Medicare Part B data sets were obtained for 1998 to 2010 for all MR examinations performed in the Medicare population. Using Current Procedural Terminology codes, the total volume and utilization rates of all MR examinations were tabulated for each year of the study period. MR volume was then categorized by body system.
RESULTS: The utilization rate of MR examinations in the Medicare population was 73 per 1,000 beneficiaries in 1998, increased to a peak of 189 in 2008, and decreased to 183 in 2010. The compound annual growth rate from 1998 to 2008 was 10%. The utilization rate in 2010 represents a decrease of 3.1% from the 2009 utilization rate. The most frequently imaged body section in every year was the head, which accounted for 2,404,250 examinations in 2010, 37.3% of all MR examinations in that year.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall MRI utilization rate sharply increased from 1998 until 2008 but then decreased in each of the next 2 years. A similar trend was noted for MR examinations performed in most body sections. These trends are likely to be the result of a number of possible causative factors.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  MRI; Medicare; health care economics; health policy; utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23542023     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  7 in total

1.  Cardiac MR Imaging and the Specter of Double-Strand Breaks.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Ruth A Kleinerman; Dorothea McAreavey; Preetha Rajaraman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  [Clinical cardiac MRI investigations with established protocols : No increased rate of DNA double-strand breaks].

Authors:  M-A Weber
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Impact of IT-enabled intervention on MRI use for back pain.

Authors:  Ivan K Ip; Esteban F Gershanik; Louise I Schneider; Ali S Raja; Wenhong Mar; Steven Seltzer; Michael J Healey; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  2005 to 2014 CT and MRI Utilization Trends in the Context of a Nondenial Prior Authorization Program.

Authors:  Adam C Powell; David C Levin; Erin M Kren; Roy A Beveridge; James W Long; Amit K Gupta
Journal:  Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol       Date:  2017-11-02

5.  The case for orthopaedic medicine in Israel.

Authors:  Aharon S Finestone; Simon Vulfsons; Charles Milgrom; Amnon Lahad; Shlomo Moshe; Gabriel Agar; Dan Greenberg
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2013-11-18

6.  National trends in advanced outpatient diagnostic imaging utilization: an analysis of the medical expenditure panel survey, 2000-2009.

Authors:  Kathleen Lang; Huan Huang; David W Lee; Victoria Federico; Joseph Menzin
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Physical Examination Is Predictive of Cauda Equina Syndrome: MRI to Rule Out Diagnosis Is Unnecessary.

Authors:  Natalie L Zusman; Stephanie S Radoslovich; Spencer J Smith; Mary Tanski; Kenneth R Gundle; Jung Uck Yoo
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-09-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.