PURPOSE: Vigabatrin-associated visual field loss (VAVFL) occurs in around 45% of exposed people. It is generally accepted that, once established, VAVFL is stable and does not progress with continued VGB use. Most studies have, however, only followed people for short periods. We assessed the evolution of VAVFL over a ten-year period of continued VGB use. METHODS: From a group of 201 vigabatrin-exposed individuals with epilepsy, fourteen individuals were identified who were currently taking vigabatrin. All individuals had at least ten years exposure to vigabatrin. Individuals underwent several visual field examinations using Goldmann perimetry between Test 1 (first recorded examination) and Test 2 (most recent examination). All visual field results were analysed and quantified retrospectively by one investigator. RESULTS: 174 visual fields from the fourteen participants were available. The average follow-up period was 128 months. The prevalence of VAVFL increased from 64% at Test 1 to 93% at Test 2. The visual field size was significantly smaller at Test 2 compared to Test 1. All subjects showed a trend for decreasing visual field size with increasing cumulative vigabatrin exposure, when all fields for an individual were taken into account. There was a high degree of variability in visual field size between successive test sessions. CONCLUSIONS: VAVFL progresses with continued vigabatrin exposure over a ten-year period. Progression may be slow and difficult to detect because of the high degree of variability in visual field size between successive test sessions. New techniques are needed to monitor the effects of vigabatrin retinotoxicity in people who continue vigabatrin therapy.
PURPOSE:Vigabatrin-associated visual field loss (VAVFL) occurs in around 45% of exposed people. It is generally accepted that, once established, VAVFL is stable and does not progress with continued VGB use. Most studies have, however, only followed people for short periods. We assessed the evolution of VAVFL over a ten-year period of continued VGB use. METHODS: From a group of 201 vigabatrin-exposed individuals with epilepsy, fourteen individuals were identified who were currently taking vigabatrin. All individuals had at least ten years exposure to vigabatrin. Individuals underwent several visual field examinations using Goldmann perimetry between Test 1 (first recorded examination) and Test 2 (most recent examination). All visual field results were analysed and quantified retrospectively by one investigator. RESULTS: 174 visual fields from the fourteen participants were available. The average follow-up period was 128 months. The prevalence of VAVFL increased from 64% at Test 1 to 93% at Test 2. The visual field size was significantly smaller at Test 2 compared to Test 1. All subjects showed a trend for decreasing visual field size with increasing cumulative vigabatrin exposure, when all fields for an individual were taken into account. There was a high degree of variability in visual field size between successive test sessions. CONCLUSIONS: VAVFL progresses with continued vigabatrin exposure over a ten-year period. Progression may be slow and difficult to detect because of the high degree of variability in visual field size between successive test sessions. New techniques are needed to monitor the effects of vigabatrin retinotoxicity in people who continue vigabatrin therapy.
Authors: John M Wild; David L Fone; Saleh Aljarudi; Charlotte Lawthom; Philip E M Smith; Robert G Newcombe; Gareth D Lewis Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 5.749
Authors: Katarzyna Nowomiejska; Marian Jedrych; Agnieszka Brzozowska; Konrad Rejdak; Tomasz Zarnowski; Michael J Koss; Katarzyna Ksiazek; Piotr Ksiazek; Ryszard Maciejewski; Anselm G Juenemann; Ulrich Schiefer; Robert Rejdak Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 2.209
Authors: Anthony P Khawaja; Jessica N Cooke Bailey; Jae Hee Kang; R Rand Allingham; Michael A Hauser; Murray Brilliant; Donald L Budenz; William G Christen; John Fingert; Douglas Gaasterland; Terry Gaasterland; Peter Kraft; Richard K Lee; Paul R Lichter; Yutao Liu; Felipe Medeiros; Syoko E Moroi; Julia E Richards; Tony Realini; Robert Ritch; Joel S Schuman; William K Scott; Kuldev Singh; Arthur J Sit; Douglas Vollrath; Gadi Wollstein; Donald J Zack; Kang Zhang; Margaret Pericak-Vance; Robert N Weinreb; Jonathan L Haines; Louis R Pasquale; Janey L Wiggs Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 4.799