Literature DB >> 23541681

The effect of mammography pain on repeat participation in breast cancer screening: a systematic review.

Patsy Whelehan1, Andy Evans, Mary Wells, Steve Macgillivray.   

Abstract

Uptake is crucial to reducing breast cancer mortality through screening. This review synthesised all available evidence on mammography pain as a deterrent to subsequent breast screening. Ten databases were searched. Studies containing empirical data relating mammography pain to breast screening re-attendance were included (n = 20). In the most robust studies asking women why they had not re-attended, 25%-46% cited pain, equivalent to approximately 47,000-87,000 women per year in England. The most robust evidence for an association between pain experienced at a previous mammogram and subsequent rates of re-attendance suggests that women who previously experienced pain are more likely than those who did not to fail to re-attend: RR 1.34 (95% CI: 0.94-1.91). The complexity of the pain phenomenon and of screening behaviours must be recognised. However, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that painful mammography contributes to non-re-attendance. Given the importance of cumulative participation, effective pain-reducing interventions in mammography are needed.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23541681     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  24 in total

1.  Compression forces used in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Gunvor G Waade; Nataliia Moshina; Sofie Sebuødegård; Peter Hogg; Solveig Hofvind
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Self-compression Technique vs Standard Compression in Mammography: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Philippe Henrot; Martine Boisserie-Lacroix; Véronique Boute; Philippe Troufléau; Bruno Boyer; Grégory Lesanne; Véronique Gillon; Emmanuel Desandes; Edith Netter; Maryam Saadate; Anne Tardivon; Christine Grentzinger; Julia Salleron; Guillaume Oldrini
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Can Breast Compression Be Reduced in Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis?

Authors:  Greeshma A Agasthya; Ellen D'Orsi; Yoon-Jin Kim; Priyanka Handa; Christopher P Ho; Carl J D'Orsi; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Breast Cancer Screening: Opportunities and Challenges with Fully 3D Tomographic X-Ray Imaging.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Bridge (Wash D C)       Date:  2022-03-28

5.  Comparison of technical parameters and women's experience between self-compression and standard compression modes in mammography screening: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Natalia Arenas; Rodrigo Alcantara; Margarita Posso; Javier Louro; Daniela Perez-Leon; Belén Ejarque; Mónica Arranz; Jose Maiques; Xavier Castells; Francesc Macià; Marta Román; Ana Rodríguez-Arana
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Health Screening: an Umbrella Review Across Conditions.

Authors:  Alice Le Bonniec; Sophie Sun; Amandine Andrin; Alexandra L Dima; Laurent Letrilliart
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2022-06-15

7.  Mammography in females with an implanted medical device: impact on image quality, pain and anxiety.

Authors:  Ellen Paap; Marloes Witjes; Cary van Landsveld-Verhoeven; Ruud M Pijnappel; Angela H E M Maas; Mireille J M Broeders
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Prevalence and Determinants of Repeat Mammography Among Women from a Developing Country.

Authors:  Ana María Salinas-Martínez; Jimena Estefanía Gaspar-Rivera; Oscar Juárez-Pérez; José Roberto Montañez-Sauceda; Georgina Mayela Núñez-Rocha; Francisco Javier Guzmán-de-la-Garza; Álvaro Mathiew-Quirós
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-04

9.  Influence of Discomfort Tolerance of Women who Undergo Mammography on the Perceived Pain Intensity Due to the Procedure.

Authors:  Neriman Akansel; Muaz Gülşen; Muhammed Gültaş
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2020-12-24

10.  Breast density in dedicated breast computed tomography: Proposal of a classification system and interreader reliability.

Authors:  Jann Wieler; Nicole Berger; Thomas Frauenfelder; Magda Marcon; Andreas Boss
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.