Literature DB >> 23541628

Use of risk assessment analysis by failure mode, effects, and criticality to reduce door-to-balloon time.

Rahul K Khare1, Anna P Nannicelli, Emilie S Powell, Nicholas P Seivert, James G Adams, Jane L Holl.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services currently endorses a door-to-balloon time of 90 minutes or less for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Recent evidence shows that a door-to-balloon time of 60 minutes significantly decreases inhospital mortality. We seek to use a proactive risk assessment method of failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) to evaluate door-to-balloon time process, to investigate how each component failure may affect the performance of a system, and to evaluate the frequency and the potential severity of harm of each failure.
METHODS: We conducted a 2-part study: FMECA of the door-to-balloon time system and process of care, and evaluation of a single institution's door-to-balloon time operational data using a retrospective observational cohort design. A multidisciplinary group of FMECA participants described the door-to-balloon time process to then create a comprehensive map and table listing all process steps and identified process failures, including their frequency, consequence, and causes. Door-to-balloon time operational data were assessed by "on" versus "off" hours.
RESULTS: Fifty-one failure points were identified across 4 door-to-balloon time phases. Of the 12 high-risk failures, 58% occurred between ECG and catheterization laboratory activation. Total door-to-balloon time during on hours had a median time of 55 minutes (95% confidence interval 46 to 60 minutes) compared with 77 minutes (95% confidence interval 68 to 83 minutes) during off hours.
CONCLUSION: The FMECA revealed clear areas of potential delay and vulnerability that can be addressed to decrease door-to-balloon time from 90 to 60 minutes. FMECAs can provide a robust assessment of potential risks and can serve as the platform for significant process improvement and system redesign for door-to-balloon time.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23541628     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  3 in total

1.  Operating room to intensive care unit handoffs and the risks of patient harm.

Authors:  Lisa M McElroy; Kelly M Collins; Felicitas L Koller; Rebeca Khorzad; Michael M Abecassis; Jane L Holl; Daniela P Ladner
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Risk Assessment of the Door-In-Door-Out Process at Primary Stroke Centers for Patients With Acute Stroke Requiring Transfer to Comprehensive Stroke Centers.

Authors:  Jane L Holl; Rebeca Khorzad; Rebecca Zobel; Amy Barnard; Maureen Hillman; Alejandro Vargas; Christopher Richards; Scott Mendelson; Shyam Prabhakaran
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  Utilization of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Method in Increasing the Revenue of Emergency Department; a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ali Shahrami; Farhad Rahmati; Hamid Kariman; Behrooz Hashemi; Majid Rahmati; Alireza Baratloo; Mohammad Mehdi Forouzanfar; Saeed Safari
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2013
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.