Literature DB >> 23541376

Systolic blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes during treatment of hypertension.

Michael A Weber1, George L Bakris, Allen Hester, Matthew R Weir, Tsushung A Hua, Dion Zappe, Bjorn Dahlof, Eric J Velazquez, Bertram Pitt, Kenneth Jamerson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Randomized controlled trials in hypertension demonstrate cardiovascular benefits when systolic blood pressures are reduced from higher values to<160 mm Hg. The value of lower targets has not been fully defined, although major guidelines recommend achieving systolic blood pressures of<140 mm Hg. This study was conducted to explore cardiovascular outcomes at differing on-treatment blood pressure levels.
METHODS: On the basis of a prespecified plan to explore relationships between clinical outcomes and systolic blood pressures, the pooled cohort of high-risk hypertensive patients (N=10,705) in the Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through Combination Therapy in Patients Living with Systolic Hypertension trial were divided into 4 strata of systolic blood pressure levels: >140 mm Hg, 130 to <140 mm Hg, 120 to <130 mm Hg, and 110 to <120 mm Hg. The primary end point was cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke. Outcomes comparisons between the blood pressure groups were by Cox regression.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 68 years, and the study duration was 35.7 months. The primary end point occurred in 171 of 3429 patients (5.0%) with systolic blood pressure in the 10 mm Hg range<140 and in 179 of 2354 patients (7.6%) with systolic blood pressure≥140 mm Hg (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50-0.77; P=.0001). Likewise, cardiovascular death decreased by 36% (P=.0147), total myocardial infarction (fatal+nonfatal) decreased by 37% (P=.0028), and stroke decreased by 47% (P=.0002). Cardiovascular event rates in those with systolic blood pressure<130 mm Hg were not different from those with systolic blood pressure<140 mm Hg. However, compared with systolic blood pressure<130 mm Hg, stroke incidence in those with systolic blood pressure<120 mm Hg was lower (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.35-1.01; P=.0529), but myocardial function was higher (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.00-2.29; P=.0437), as were composite coronary events (myocardial infarction, hospitalized angina, or sudden death) (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.18-2.24; P=.0023). The renal end point of a sustained>50% increase in serum creatinine was significantly lower in those with systolic blood pressure<140 mm Hg than in any of the other higher or lower blood pressure ranges.
CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk hypertensive patients, major cardiovascular events are significantly lower in those with systolic blood pressures<140 mm Hg and<130 mm Hg than in those with levels>140 mm Hg. There are stroke benefits at levels<120 mm Hg, but they are offset by increased coronary events. Renal function is best protected in the 130 to 139 mm Hg range.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23541376     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  25 in total

1.  [Interdisciplinary interaction for vascular diseases of the eye].

Authors:  P Franko Zeitz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  J-shaped curve for cardiovascular mortality: systolic or diastolic blood pressure?

Authors:  Nicolás Roberto Robles; Francesco Fici; Guido Grassi
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 3.  Prehypertension--prevalence, health risks, and management strategies.

Authors:  Brent M Egan; Sean Stevens-Fabry
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Blood pressure level and risk of major cardiovascular events and all-cause of mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and renal impairment: an observational study from the Swedish National Diabetes Register.

Authors:  Hanri Afghahi; Maria K Svensson; Mirnabi Pirouzifard; Björn Eliasson; Ann-Marie Svensson
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 5.  The Case for Low Blood Pressure Targets.

Authors:  John M Flack; Carlos Nolasco; Phillip Levy
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 6.  Current therapeutic approaches to cardio-protection in hypertension.

Authors:  David Parra; Augustus Hough
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.369

7.  Closing the gap in hypertension control between younger and older adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1988 to 2010.

Authors:  Brent M Egan; Jiexiang Li; Ibrahim F Shatat; J Michael Fuller; Angelo Sinopoli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  New evidence for the diastolic J-curve effect challenges the safety of intensive blood pressure control.

Authors:  Steven G Chrysant
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 9.  Does a blood pressure J curve exist for patients with chronic kidney disease?

Authors:  Nicolás Roberto Robles; Roman Hernandez-Gallego; Francesco Fici; Guido Grassi
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Blood Pressure Control Provides Less Cardiovascular Protection in Adults With Than Without Apparent Treatment-Resistant Hypertension.

Authors:  Brent M Egan; Bo Kai; C Shaun Wagner; Joseph H Henderson; Archie H Chandler; Angelo Sinopoli
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.