Literature DB >> 23540492

Maximizing dosimetric benefits of IMRT in the treatment of localized prostate cancer through multicriteria optimization planning.

Jeremiah Wala1, David Craft, Jon Paly, Anthony Zietman, Jason Efstathiou.   

Abstract

We examine the quality of plans created using multicriteria optimization (MCO) treatment planning in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in treatment of localized prostate cancer. Nine random cases of patients receiving IMRT to the prostate were selected. Each case was associated with a clinically approved plan created using Corvus. The cases were replanned using MCO-based planning in RayStation. Dose-volume histogram data from both planning systems were presented to 2 radiation oncologists in a blinded evaluation, and were compared at a number of dose-volume points. Both physicians rated all 9 MCO plans as superior to the clinically approved plans (p<10(-5)). Target coverage was equivalent (p = 0.81). Maximum doses to the prostate and bladder and the V50 and V70 to the anterior rectum were reduced in all MCO plans (p<0.05). Treatment planning time with MCO took approximately 60 minutes per case. MCO-based planning for prostate IMRT is efficient and produces high-quality plans with good target homogeneity and sparing of the anterior rectum, bladder, and femoral heads, without sacrificing target coverage.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IMRT; Multicriteria optimization; Prostate

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23540492     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2013.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  7 in total

Review 1.  Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations.

Authors:  Mohammad Hussein; Ben J M Heijmen; Dirk Verellen; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Jens Overgaard; Jürgen Debus; Søren M Bentzen; Juliane Daartz; Christian Richter; Daniel Zips; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Multicriteria optimization enables less experienced planners to efficiently produce high quality treatment plans in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Roel G J Kierkels; Ruurd Visser; Hendrik P Bijl; Johannes A Langendijk; Aart A van 't Veld; Roel J H M Steenbakkers; Erik W Korevaar
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Effectiveness of Multi-Criteria Optimization-based Trade-Off exploration in combination with RapidPlan for head & neck radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Eliane Miguel-Chumacero; Garry Currie; Abigail Johnston; Suzanne Currie
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  A broad scope knowledge based model for optimization of VMAT in esophageal cancer: validation and assessment of plan quality among different treatment centers.

Authors:  Antonella Fogliata; Giorgia Nicolini; Alessandro Clivio; Eugenio Vanetti; Sarbani Laksar; Angelo Tozzi; Marta Scorsetti; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Assessment of multi-criteria optimization (MCO) for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT).

Authors:  Stephen Zieminski; Melin Khandekar; Yi Wang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Multicriteria plan optimization in the hands of physicians: a pilot study in prostate cancer and brain tumors.

Authors:  Birgit S Müller; Helen A Shih; Jason A Efstathiou; Thomas Bortfeld; David Craft
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.481

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.