OBJECTIVE: Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) at the time of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine needle aspiration (EBUS-TBFNA) is useful in obtaining adequate samples and providing preliminary diagnosis. We present our experience with ROSE of EBUS-TBFNA using telecytopathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Real-time images of Diff-Quik (Mercedes Medical, Sarasota, FL)-stained cytology smears were obtained with an Olympus (Olympus America, Center Valley, PA) digital camera attached to an Olympus CX41 microscope and transmitted via ethernet by a cytotechnologist to a cytopathologist in a cytopathology laboratory who rendered a preliminary diagnosis while communicating with an on-site cytotechnologist via the Vocera (San Jose, CA) voice communication system. The endoscopy suite was located a block away from the cytopathology laboratory. Accuracy of ROSE via telecytopathology was compared with an equal number of cases that received ROSE, prior to introduction of telecytopathology, via conventional microscopy. RESULTS: ROSE was performed on a total of 200 EBUS-TBFNAs. The telecytopathology system and conventional microscopy were used to evaluate equal numbers of cases (100 each). Preliminary diagnoses of negative/benign, atypical/suspicious, and positive for malignancy were 58%, 14%, and 24% for telecytopathology and 57%, 10%, and 31% for conventional microscopy. Four percent of telecytopathology cases and 2% of conventional microscopy cases were deemed unsatisfactory at the time of ROSE. The overall concordance between the preliminary and final diagnoses was 96% for telecytopathology and 93% for conventional microscopy. The causes of discordant preliminary and final diagnoses could be mainly attributed to difficulty in distinguishing small cell carcinoma versus reactive lymph node due to crush artifact, atypia related to reactive bronchial epithelial cells, and availability of cell block material and Papanicolaou-stained slides for review at the time of final cytologic sign out. CONCLUSIONS: Telecytopathology is comparable with conventional microscopy in ROSE of EBUS-TBFNA. It can serve as a valid substitute for conventional microscopy for on-site assessment of EBUS-TBFNA.
OBJECTIVE: Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) at the time of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine needle aspiration (EBUS-TBFNA) is useful in obtaining adequate samples and providing preliminary diagnosis. We present our experience with ROSE of EBUS-TBFNA using telecytopathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Real-time images of Diff-Quik (Mercedes Medical, Sarasota, FL)-stained cytology smears were obtained with an Olympus (Olympus America, Center Valley, PA) digital camera attached to an Olympus CX41 microscope and transmitted via ethernet by a cytotechnologist to a cytopathologist in a cytopathology laboratory who rendered a preliminary diagnosis while communicating with an on-site cytotechnologist via the Vocera (San Jose, CA) voice communication system. The endoscopy suite was located a block away from the cytopathology laboratory. Accuracy of ROSE via telecytopathology was compared with an equal number of cases that received ROSE, prior to introduction of telecytopathology, via conventional microscopy. RESULTS: ROSE was performed on a total of 200 EBUS-TBFNAs. The telecytopathology system and conventional microscopy were used to evaluate equal numbers of cases (100 each). Preliminary diagnoses of negative/benign, atypical/suspicious, and positive for malignancy were 58%, 14%, and 24% for telecytopathology and 57%, 10%, and 31% for conventional microscopy. Four percent of telecytopathology cases and 2% of conventional microscopy cases were deemed unsatisfactory at the time of ROSE. The overall concordance between the preliminary and final diagnoses was 96% for telecytopathology and 93% for conventional microscopy. The causes of discordant preliminary and final diagnoses could be mainly attributed to difficulty in distinguishing small cell carcinoma versus reactive lymph node due to crush artifact, atypia related to reactive bronchial epithelial cells, and availability of cell block material and Papanicolaou-stained slides for review at the time of final cytologic sign out. CONCLUSIONS: Telecytopathology is comparable with conventional microscopy in ROSE of EBUS-TBFNA. It can serve as a valid substitute for conventional microscopy for on-site assessment of EBUS-TBFNA.
Authors: Rashid L Bashshur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Ronald S Weinstein; Matthew R Dunn; Noura Bashshur Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 3.536