Literature DB >> 23539543

Cardiogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on elastomeric poly (glycerol sebacate)/collagen core/shell fibers.

Rajeswari Ravichandran1, Jayarama Reddy Venugopal, Subramanian Sundarrajan, Shayanti Mukherjee, Seeram Ramakrishna.   

Abstract

AIM: To facilitate engineering of suitable biomaterials to meet the challenges associated with myocardial infarction.
METHODS: Poly (glycerol sebacate)/collagen (PGS/collagen) core/shell fibers were fabricated by core/shell electrospinning technique, with core as PGS and shell as collagen polymer; and the scaffolds were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM), fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), contact angle and tensile testing for cardiac tissue engineering. Collagen nanofibers were also fabricated by electrospinning for comparison with core/shell fibers. Studies on cell-scaffold interaction were carried out using cardiac cells and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) co-culture system with cardiac cells and MSCs separately serving as positive and negative controls respectively. The co-culture system was characterized for cell proliferation and differentiation of MSCs into cardiomyogenic lineage in the co-culture environment using dual immunocytochemistry. The co-culture cells were stained with cardiac specific marker proteins like actinin and troponin and MSC specific marker protein CD 105 for proving the cardiogenic differentiation of MSCs. Further the morphology of cells was analyzed using SEM.
RESULTS: PGS/collagen core/shell fibers, core is PGS polymer having an elastic modulus related to that of cardiac fibers and shell as collagen, providing natural environment for cellular activities like cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation. SEM micrographs of electrospun fibrous scaffolds revealed porous, beadless, uniform fibers with a fiber diameter in the range of 380 ± 77 nm and 1192 ± 277 nm for collagen fibers and PGS/collagen core/shell fibers respectively. The obtained PGS/collagen core/shell fibrous scaffolds were hydrophilic having a water contact angle of 17.9 ± 4.6° compared to collagen nanofibers which had a contact angle value of 30 ± 3.2°. The PGS/collagen core/shell fibers had mechanical properties comparable to that of native heart muscle with a young's modulus of 4.24 ± 0.7 MPa, while that of collagen nanofibers was comparatively higher around 30.11 ± 1.68 MPa. FTIR spectrum was performed to confirm the functional groups present in the electrospun scaffolds. Amide I and amide II of collagen were detected at 1638.95 cm(-1) and 1551.64 cm(-1) in the electrospun collagen fibers and at 1646.22 cm(-1) and 1540.73 cm(-1) for PGS/collagen core/shell fibers respectively. Cell culture studies performed using MSCs and cardiac cells co-culture environment, indicated that the cell proliferation significantly increased on PGS/collagen core/shell scaffolds compared to collagen fibers and the cardiac marker proteins actinin and troponin were expressed more on PGS/collagen core/shell scaffolds compared to collagen fibers alone. Dual immunofluorescent staining was performed to further confirm the cardiogenic differentiation of MSCs by employing MSC specific marker protein, CD 105 and cardiac specific marker protein, actinin. SEM observations of cardiac cells showed normal morphology on PGS/collagen fibers and providing adequate tensile strength for the regeneration of myocardial infarction.
CONCLUSION: Combination of PGS/collagen fibers and cardiac cells/MSCs co-culture system providing natural microenvironments to improve cell survival and differentiation, could bring cardiac tissue engineering to clinical application.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac cells; Cardiac patch; Co-culture; Core/shell fibers.; Mesenchymal stem cells; Poly (glycerol sebacate)

Year:  2013        PMID: 23539543      PMCID: PMC3610004          DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v5.i3.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Cardiol


  60 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac endothelial-myocardial signaling: its role in cardiac growth, contractile performance, and rhythmicity.

Authors:  Dirk L Brutsaert
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Cultured interstitial cells from human heart valves express both specific skeletal muscle and non-muscle markers.

Authors:  Nigel J Brand; Anjana Roy; Ginette Hoare; Adrian Chester; Magdi H Yacoub
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2005-07-25       Impact factor: 5.085

3.  Enhanced recovery of mechanical function in the canine heart by seeding an extracellular matrix patch with mesenchymal stem cells committed to a cardiac lineage.

Authors:  Irina A Potapova; Sergey V Doronin; Damon J Kelly; Amy B Rosen; Adam J T Schuldt; Zhongju Lu; Paul V Kochupura; Richard B Robinson; Michael R Rosen; Peter R Brink; Glenn R Gaudette; Ira S Cohen
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 4.  The role of basement membrane in angiogenesis and tumor growth.

Authors:  D S Grant; M C Kibbey; J L Kinsella; M C Cid; H K Kleinman
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.250

5.  Effects of nanotopography on stem cell phenotypes.

Authors:  Rajeswari Ravichandran; Susan Liao; Clarisse Ch Ng; Casey K Chan; Michael Raghunath; Seeram Ramakrishna
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 5.326

6.  Precipitation of nanohydroxyapatite on PLLA/PBLG/Collagen nanofibrous structures for the differentiation of adipose derived stem cells to osteogenic lineage.

Authors:  Rajeswari Ravichandran; Jayarama Reddy Venugopal; Subramanian Sundarrajan; Shayanti Mukherjee; Seeram Ramakrishna
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Regenerating functional myocardium: improved performance after skeletal myoblast transplantation.

Authors:  D A Taylor; B Z Atkins; P Hungspreugs; T R Jones; M C Reedy; K A Hutcheson; D D Glower; W E Kraus
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  In vivo survival and function of transplanted rat cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  R K Li; D A Mickle; R D Weisel; J Zhang; M K Mohabeer
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  Stimulation of angiogenesis as an explanation of Matrigel-enhanced tumorigenicity.

Authors:  R D Bonfil; A Vinyals; O D Bustuoabad; A Llorens; F J Benavides; M Gonzalez-Garrigues; A Fabra
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 10.  Cardiac interstitium in health and disease: the fibrillar collagen network.

Authors:  K T Weber
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  16 in total

1.  Click chemistry approach for fabricating PVA/gelatin nanofibers for the differentiation of ADSCs to keratinocytes.

Authors:  Rajeswari Ravichandran; Jayarama Reddy Venugopal; Subramanian Sundarrajan; Shayanti Mukherjee; John Forsythe; Seeram Ramakrishna
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Tissue Engineering Strategies for Myocardial Regeneration: Acellular Versus Cellular Scaffolds?

Authors:  Maribella Domenech; Lilliana Polo-Corrales; Jaime E Ramirez-Vick; Donald O Freytes
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 3.  Photopolymerizable Biomaterials and Light-Based 3D Printing Strategies for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Claire Yu; Jacob Schimelman; Pengrui Wang; Kathleen L Miller; Xuanyi Ma; Shangting You; Jiaao Guan; Bingjie Sun; Wei Zhu; Shaochen Chen
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Characterization of nanofibers for tissue engineering: Chemical mapping by Confocal Raman microscopy.

Authors:  Anna Sharikova; Zahraa I Foraida; Lauren Sfakis; Lubna Peerzada; Melinda Larsen; James Castracane; Alexander Khmaladze
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 4.098

Review 5.  Biomaterial Approaches for Stem Cell-Based Myocardial Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Josh Cutts; Mehdi Nikkhah; David A Brafman
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2015-06-01

Review 6.  How to Improve the Survival of Transplanted Mesenchymal Stem Cell in Ischemic Heart?

Authors:  Liangpeng Li; Xiongwen Chen; Wei Eric Wang; Chunyu Zeng
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 7.  In vivo experience with natural scaffolds for myocardial infarction: the times they are a-changin'.

Authors:  Isaac Perea-Gil; Cristina Prat-Vidal; Antoni Bayes-Genis
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 8.  Reprogramming for cardiac regeneration.

Authors:  Christophe Michel Raynaud; Faizzan Syed Ahmad; Mona Allouba; Haissam Abou-Saleh; Kathy O Lui; Magdi Yacoub
Journal:  Glob Cardiol Sci Pract       Date:  2014-10-16

9.  Smad7-overexpressing rat BMSCs inhibit the fibrosis of hepatic stellate cells by regulating the TGF-β1/Smad signaling pathway.

Authors:  Shi-Pin Wu; Zhi Yang; Fu-Rong Li; Xiao-Di Liu; Hong-Tao Chen; Dong-Na Su
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Fabrication and Characterization of Drug-Loaded Conductive Poly(glycerol sebacate)/Nanoparticle-Based Composite Patch for Myocardial Infarction Applications.

Authors:  Nazanin Zanjanizadeh Ezazi; Rubina Ajdary; Alexandra Correia; Ermei Mäkilä; Jarno Salonen; Marianna Kemell; Jouni Hirvonen; Orlando J Rojas; Heikki J Ruskoaho; Hélder A Santos
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 9.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.