Matthew Salamonsen1, David McGrath2, Geoff Steiler2, Robert Ware3, Henri Colt4, David Fielding5. 1. Department of Thoracic Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Electronic address: mattsalamonsen@gmail.com. 2. Department of Medical Imaging, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 3. School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 4. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA. 5. Department of Thoracic Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To reduce complications and increase success, thoracic ultrasound is recommended to guide all chest drainage procedures. Despite this, no tools currently exist to assess proceduralist training or competence. This study aims to validate an instrument to assess physician skill at performing thoracic ultrasound, including effusion markup, and examine its validity. METHODS: We developed an 11-domain, 100-point assessment sheet in line with British Thoracic Society guidelines: the Ultrasound-Guided Thoracentesis Skills and Tasks Assessment Test (UGSTAT). The test was used to assess 22 participants (eight novices, seven intermediates, seven advanced) on two occasions while performing thoracic ultrasound on a pleural effusion phantom. Each test was scored by two blinded expert examiners. Validity was examined by assessing the ability of the test to stratify participants according to expected skill level (analysis of variance) and demonstrating test-retest and intertester reproducibility by comparison of repeated scores (mean difference [95% CI] and paired t test) and the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Mean scores for the novice, intermediate, and advanced groups were 49.3, 73.0, and 91.5 respectively, which were all significantly different (P < .0001). There were no significant differences between repeated scores. CONCLUSIONS: Procedural training on mannequins prior to unsupervised performance on patients is rapidly becoming the standard in medical education. This study has validated the UGSTAT, which can now be used to determine the adequacy of thoracic ultrasound training prior to clinical practice. It is likely that its role could be extended to live patients, providing a way to document ongoing procedural competence.
BACKGROUND: To reduce complications and increase success, thoracic ultrasound is recommended to guide all chest drainage procedures. Despite this, no tools currently exist to assess proceduralist training or competence. This study aims to validate an instrument to assess physician skill at performing thoracic ultrasound, including effusion markup, and examine its validity. METHODS: We developed an 11-domain, 100-point assessment sheet in line with British Thoracic Society guidelines: the Ultrasound-Guided Thoracentesis Skills and Tasks Assessment Test (UGSTAT). The test was used to assess 22 participants (eight novices, seven intermediates, seven advanced) on two occasions while performing thoracic ultrasound on a pleural effusion phantom. Each test was scored by two blinded expert examiners. Validity was examined by assessing the ability of the test to stratify participants according to expected skill level (analysis of variance) and demonstrating test-retest and intertester reproducibility by comparison of repeated scores (mean difference [95% CI] and paired t test) and the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Mean scores for the novice, intermediate, and advanced groups were 49.3, 73.0, and 91.5 respectively, which were all significantly different (P < .0001). There were no significant differences between repeated scores. CONCLUSIONS: Procedural training on mannequins prior to unsupervised performance on patients is rapidly becoming the standard in medical education. This study has validated the UGSTAT, which can now be used to determine the adequacy of thoracic ultrasound training prior to clinical practice. It is likely that its role could be extended to live patients, providing a way to document ongoing procedural competence.
Authors: Paru Patrawalla; Lewis Ari Eisen; Ariel Shiloh; Brijen J Shah; Oleksandr Savenkov; Wendy Wise; Laura Evans; Paul Mayo; Demian Szyld Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2015-12
Authors: Matthew Evison; Kevin G Blyth; Rahul Bhatnagar; John Corcoran; Tarek Saba; Tracy Duncan; Rob Hallifax; Liju Ahmed; Alex West; Justin Charles Thane Pepperell; Mark Roberts; Pasupathy Sivasothy; Ioannis Psallidas; Amelia O Clive; Jennifer Latham; Andrew E Stanton; Nick Maskell; Najib Rahman Journal: BMJ Open Respir Res Date: 2018-08-03
Authors: John P Corcoran; Ioannis Psallidas; John M Wrightson; Robert J Hallifax; Najib M Rahman Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Luigi Vetrugno; Giovanni Volpicelli; Federico Barbariol; Ilaria Toretti; Livia Pompei; Francesco Forfori; Giorgio Della Rocca Journal: Crit Ultrasound J Date: 2016-02-18
Authors: Etrusca Brogi; Elena Bignami; Anna Sidoti; Mohammed Shawar; Luna Gargani; Luigi Vetrugno; Giovanni Volpicelli; Francesco Forfori Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 2.062