OBJECTIVES: Early broad-spectrum antimicrobial treatment reduces mortality in patients with septic shock. In a multicenter, prospective observational study, we explored whether delayed appropriate antimicrobial therapy (AAT) influences outcome in Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SAB). METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-six patients with SAB from ten German study centers were enrolled and followed for 3 months. Predisposing factors, clinical features, diagnostic procedures, antimicrobial therapy, and outcome were recorded. The appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy was judged by a trained physician based on in vitro activity, dosage, and duration of therapy. Therapy was considered to be delayed when more than 24 h elapsed between the first positive blood culture and the start of appropriate therapy. The association of delayed therapy with overall mortality and SAB-related events (i.e., attributable mortality or late SAB-related complications) was assessed by crosstabulation and propensity score-based logistic regression. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-eight patients received AAT during their hospital stay, of whom 42 (25%) received delayed AAT. The overall mortality and the occurrence of severe sepsis or septic shock were lower in patients with delayed AAT, pointing towards confounding by indication. Adjusted 90-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.39-2.13], p 0.82) and SAB-related events (adjusted OR 1.46, 95% CI [0.47-4.51], p 0.52) also failed to show a significant impact of delayed AAT on outcome. CONCLUSION: In patients with SAB, early AAT may not improve survival. However, confounding by indication is a major challenge when analyzing and interpreting observational studies on the impact of delayed AAT.
OBJECTIVES: Early broad-spectrum antimicrobial treatment reduces mortality in patients with septic shock. In a multicenter, prospective observational study, we explored whether delayed appropriate antimicrobial therapy (AAT) influences outcome in Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SAB). METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-six patients with SAB from ten German study centers were enrolled and followed for 3 months. Predisposing factors, clinical features, diagnostic procedures, antimicrobial therapy, and outcome were recorded. The appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy was judged by a trained physician based on in vitro activity, dosage, and duration of therapy. Therapy was considered to be delayed when more than 24 h elapsed between the first positive blood culture and the start of appropriate therapy. The association of delayed therapy with overall mortality and SAB-related events (i.e., attributable mortality or late SAB-related complications) was assessed by crosstabulation and propensity score-based logistic regression. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-eight patients received AAT during their hospital stay, of whom 42 (25%) received delayed AAT. The overall mortality and the occurrence of severe sepsis or septic shock were lower in patients with delayed AAT, pointing towards confounding by indication. Adjusted 90-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.39-2.13], p 0.82) and SAB-related events (adjusted OR 1.46, 95% CI [0.47-4.51], p 0.52) also failed to show a significant impact of delayed AAT on outcome. CONCLUSION: In patients with SAB, early AAT may not improve survival. However, confounding by indication is a major challenge when analyzing and interpreting observational studies on the impact of delayed AAT.
Authors: Kamal M F Itani; Kasem S Akhras; Robert Stellhorn; Alvaro Quintana; David Budd; Sanjay Merchant Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2009 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: R Phillip Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Jean M Carlet; Julian Bion; Margaret M Parker; Roman Jaeschke; Konrad Reinhart; Derek C Angus; Christian Brun-Buisson; Richard Beale; Thierry Calandra; Jean-Francois Dhainaut; Herwig Gerlach; Maurene Harvey; John J Marini; John Marshall; Marco Ranieri; Graham Ramsay; Jonathan Sevransky; B Taylor Thompson; Sean Townsend; Jeffrey S Vender; Janice L Zimmerman; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: D Marchaim; K S Kaye; V G Fowler; D J Anderson; V Chawla; Y Golan; A W Karchmer; Y Carmeli Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2009-09-11 Impact factor: 8.067
Authors: Andrew Rhodes; Laura E Evans; Waleed Alhazzani; Mitchell M Levy; Massimo Antonelli; Ricard Ferrer; Anand Kumar; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Mark E Nunnally; Bram Rochwerg; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Derek C Angus; Djillali Annane; Richard J Beale; Geoffrey J Bellinghan; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig Coopersmith; Daniel P De Backer; Craig J French; Seitaro Fujishima; Herwig Gerlach; Jorge Luis Hidalgo; Steven M Hollenberg; Alan E Jones; Dilip R Karnad; Ruth M Kleinpell; Younsuk Koh; Thiago Costa Lisboa; Flavia R Machado; John J Marini; John C Marshall; John E Mazuski; Lauralyn A McIntyre; Anthony S McLean; Sangeeta Mehta; Rui P Moreno; John Myburgh; Paolo Navalesi; Osamu Nishida; Tiffany M Osborn; Anders Perner; Colleen M Plunkett; Marco Ranieri; Christa A Schorr; Maureen A Seckel; Christopher W Seymour; Lisa Shieh; Khalid A Shukri; Steven Q Simpson; Mervyn Singer; B Taylor Thompson; Sean R Townsend; Thomas Van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; W Joost Wiersinga; Janice L Zimmerman; R Phillip Dellinger Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Natasha E Holmes; J Owen Robinson; Sebastiaan J van Hal; Wendy J Munckhof; Eugene Athan; Tony M Korman; Allen C Cheng; John D Turnidge; Paul D R Johnson; Benjamin P Howden Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 3.090