Literature DB >> 23538902

Inhibition of Wee1, AKT, and CDK4 underlies the efficacy of the HSP90 inhibitor XL888 in an in vivo model of NRAS-mutant melanoma.

H Eirik Haarberg1, Kim H T Paraiso, Elizabeth Wood, Vito W Rebecca, Vernon K Sondak, John M Koomen, Keiran S M Smalley.   

Abstract

The HSP90 inhibitor XL888 is effective at reversing BRAF inhibitor resistance in melanoma, including that mediated through acquired NRAS mutations. The present study has investigated the mechanism of action of XL888 in NRAS-mutant melanoma. Treatment of NRAS-mutant melanoma cell lines with XL888 led to an inhibition of growth, G2-M phase cell-cycle arrest, and the inhibition of cell survival in three-dimensional spheroid and colony formation assays. In vitro, HSP90 inhibition led to the degradation of ARAF, CRAF, Wee1, Chk1, and cdc2 and was associated with decreased mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), AKT, mTOR, and c-jun NH2 kinase (JNK) signaling. Apoptosis induction was associated with increased BIM expression and a decrease in the expression of the prosurvival protein Mcl-1. The critical role of increased BIM and decreased Mcl-1 expression in the survival of NRAS-mutant melanoma cell lines was shown through siRNA knockdown and overexpression studies. In an animal xenograft model of NRAS-mutant melanoma, XL888 treatment led to reduced tumor growth and apoptosis induction. Important differences in the pattern of client degradation were noted between the in vivo and in vitro studies. In vivo, XL888 treatment led to degradation of CDK4 and Wee1 and the inhibition of AKT/S6 signaling with little or no effect observed upon ARAF, CRAF, or MAPK. Blockade of Wee1, using either siRNA knockdown or the inhibitor MK1775, was associated with significant levels of growth inhibition and apoptosis induction. Together, these studies have identified Wee1 as a key target of XL888, suggesting novel therapeutic strategies for NRAS-mutant melanoma. ©2013 AACR

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23538902      PMCID: PMC3683468          DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-1003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther        ISSN: 1535-7163            Impact factor:   6.261


  49 in total

1.  NRAS mutation status is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  John A Jakob; Roland L Bassett; Chaan S Ng; Jonathan L Curry; Richard W Joseph; Gladys C Alvarado; Michelle L Rohlfs; Jessie Richard; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Kevin B Kim; Alexander J Lazar; Patrick Hwu; Michael A Davies
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  V600E B-Raf requires the Hsp90 chaperone for stability and is degraded in response to Hsp90 inhibitors.

Authors:  O M Grbovic; A D Basso; A Sawai; Q Ye; P Friedlander; D Solit; N Rosen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Combinations of BRAF, MEK, and PI3K/mTOR inhibitors overcome acquired resistance to the BRAF inhibitor GSK2118436 dabrafenib, mediated by NRAS or MEK mutations.

Authors:  James G Greger; Stephen D Eastman; Vivian Zhang; Maureen R Bleam; Ashley M Hughes; Kimberly N Smitheman; Scott H Dickerson; Sylvie G Laquerre; Li Liu; Tona M Gilmer
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 6.261

4.  Quantitative analysis of HSP90-client interactions reveals principles of substrate recognition.

Authors:  Mikko Taipale; Irina Krykbaeva; Martina Koeva; Can Kayatekin; Kenneth D Westover; Georgios I Karras; Susan Lindquist
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Abrogation of BRAFV600E-induced senescence by PI3K pathway activation contributes to melanomagenesis.

Authors:  Liesbeth C W Vredeveld; Patricia A Possik; Marjon A Smit; Katrin Meissl; Chrysiis Michaloglou; Hugo M Horlings; Abderrahim Ajouaou; Pim C Kortman; David Dankort; Martin McMahon; Wolter J Mooi; Daniel S Peeper
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 6.  NRAS mutant melanoma: biological behavior and future strategies for therapeutic management.

Authors:  I V Fedorenko; G T Gibney; K S M Smalley
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Oncogenic NRAS signaling differentially regulates survival and proliferation in melanoma.

Authors:  Lawrence N Kwong; James C Costello; Huiyun Liu; Shan Jiang; Timothy L Helms; Aliete E Langsdorf; David Jakubosky; Giannicola Genovese; Florian L Muller; Joseph H Jeong; Ryan P Bender; Gerald C Chu; Keith T Flaherty; Jennifer A Wargo; James J Collins; Lynda Chin
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 8.  Targeting RAS signalling pathways in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Julian Downward
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  High expression of Wee1 is associated with poor disease-free survival in malignant melanoma: potential for targeted therapy.

Authors:  Gry Irene Magnussen; Ruth Holm; Elisabeth Emilsen; Anne Katrine Ree Rosnes; Ana Slipicevic; Vivi Ann Flørenes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Activation of the ERK1/2 signaling pathway promotes phosphorylation and proteasome-dependent degradation of the BH3-only protein, Bim.

Authors:  Rebecca Ley; Kathryn Balmanno; Kathryn Hadfield; Claire Weston; Simon J Cook
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Searching for the Chokehold of NRAS Mutant Melanoma.

Authors:  Christian Posch; Igor Vujic; Babak Monshi; Martina Sanlorenzo; Felix Weihsengruber; Klemens Rappersberger; Susana Ortiz-Urda
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 8.551

2.  Specific c-Jun target genes in malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Patrick Schummer; Silke Kuphal; Lily Vardimon; Anja K Bosserhoff; Melanie Kappelmann
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 3.  Toxoplasma gondii Hsp90: potential roles in essential cellular processes of the parasite.

Authors:  Sergio O Angel; Maria J Figueras; Maria L Alomar; Pablo C Echeverria; Bin Deng
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 4.  NRAS mutant melanoma: an overview for the clinician for melanoma management.

Authors:  Russell W Jenkins; Ryan J Sullivan
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2016-02-17

5.  Delivery of HSP90 Inhibitor Using Water Soluble Polymeric Conjugates with High Drug Payload.

Authors:  Jose A Suárez Del Pino; Rohit Kolhatkar
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Ceritinib Enhances the Efficacy of Trametinib in BRAF/NRAS-Wild-Type Melanoma Cell Lines.

Authors:  Daniel Verduzco; Brent M Kuenzi; Fumi Kinose; Vernon K Sondak; Zeynep Eroglu; Uwe Rix; Keiran S M Smalley
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 7.  Treatment of NRAS-mutant melanoma.

Authors:  Douglas B Johnson; Igor Puzanov
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-04

8.  HDAC8 Regulates a Stress Response Pathway in Melanoma to Mediate Escape from BRAF Inhibitor Therapy.

Authors:  Michael F Emmons; Fernanda Faião-Flores; Ritin Sharma; Ram Thapa; Jane L Messina; Jurgen C Becker; Dirk Schadendorf; Edward Seto; Vernon K Sondak; John M Koomen; Yian A Chen; Eric K Lau; Lixin Wan; Jonathan D Licht; Keiran S M Smalley
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  Pathways and therapeutic targets in melanoma.

Authors:  Emma Shtivelman; Michael Q A Davies; Patrick Hwu; James Yang; Michal Lotem; Moshe Oren; Keith T Flaherty; David E Fisher
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-04-15

Review 10.  Molecular pathways: targeting NRAS in melanoma and acute myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Douglas B Johnson; Keiran S M Smalley; Jeffrey A Sosman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.