OBJECTIVES: Evidence of how health-related quality of life (HRQOL) changes following laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery in the first 6 weeks of postoperative recovery is needed to inform cost-effectiveness evaluations. METHODS: Pragmatic prospective cohort study design. Consecutive patients requiring elective colorectal surgery were allocated to either laparoscopic or open surgery by administrative staff in a district general hospital in England, 2006-2007. Patients completed two validated, generic measures of HRQOL at baseline (preoperatively) and on multiple occasions in the first 6 weeks postsurgery using diaries (EuroQol five-dimensional [EQ-5D] questionnaire: 16 times; short-form 36 health survey [SF-36]: 4 times; HRQOL was compared between groups at each time point, and overall using repeated-measures analysis. RESULTS: Of 201 consecutive patients recruited, 32 (15.1%) were unable to complete diaries. Of the remaining 169 patients, 120 (71%) returned completed diaries at 28 days and 105 (62.1%) at 42 days. There was no difference in preoperative HRQOL scores between surgical groups, but the postoperative EQ-5D questionnaire and SF-36 scores were significantly higher in the laparoscopic group (EQ-5D questionnaire P = 0.005, SF-36 P = 0.007). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with a stoma have worse HRQOL than those without. HRQOL did not differ between the laparoscopic and open stoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents unique prospective data demonstrating that laparoscopic surgery confers HRQOL benefits for patients in the early recovery period following colorectal surgery, compared with open surgery. Consideration of these data in the context of a cost-effectiveness analysis will be reported separately.
OBJECTIVES: Evidence of how health-related quality of life (HRQOL) changes following laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery in the first 6 weeks of postoperative recovery is needed to inform cost-effectiveness evaluations. METHODS: Pragmatic prospective cohort study design. Consecutive patients requiring elective colorectal surgery were allocated to either laparoscopic or open surgery by administrative staff in a district general hospital in England, 2006-2007. Patients completed two validated, generic measures of HRQOL at baseline (preoperatively) and on multiple occasions in the first 6 weeks postsurgery using diaries (EuroQol five-dimensional [EQ-5D] questionnaire: 16 times; short-form 36 health survey [SF-36]: 4 times; HRQOL was compared between groups at each time point, and overall using repeated-measures analysis. RESULTS: Of 201 consecutive patients recruited, 32 (15.1%) were unable to complete diaries. Of the remaining 169 patients, 120 (71%) returned completed diaries at 28 days and 105 (62.1%) at 42 days. There was no difference in preoperative HRQOL scores between surgical groups, but the postoperative EQ-5D questionnaire and SF-36 scores were significantly higher in the laparoscopic group (EQ-5D questionnaire P = 0.005, SF-36 P = 0.007). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with a stoma have worse HRQOL than those without. HRQOL did not differ between the laparoscopic and open stoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents unique prospective data demonstrating that laparoscopic surgery confers HRQOL benefits for patients in the early recovery period following colorectal surgery, compared with open surgery. Consideration of these data in the context of a cost-effectiveness analysis will be reported separately.
Authors: Isacco Montroni; Giampaolo Ugolini; Nicole M Saur; Siri Rostoft; Antonino Spinelli; Barbara L Van Leeuwen; Nicola De Liguori Carino; Federico Ghignone; Michael T Jaklitsch; Ponnandai Somasundar; Anna Garutti; Chiara Zingaretti; Flavia Foca; Bernadette Vertogen; Oriana Nanni; Steven D Wexner; Riccardo A Audisio Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 11.816
Authors: Annefleur E M Berkel; Bart C Bongers; Marie-Janne S van Kamp; Hayke Kotte; Paul Weltevreden; Frans H C de Jongh; Michiel M M Eijsvogel; A N Machteld Wymenga; Marloes Bigirwamungu-Bargeman; Job van der Palen; Marc J van Det; Nico L U van Meeteren; Joost M Klaase Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Ianthe Boden; Laura Browning; Elizabeth H Skinner; Julie Reeve; Doa El-Ansary; Iain K Robertson; Linda Denehy Journal: Trials Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Alan Lobo; Rafael Torrejon Torres; Mark McAlindon; Simon Panter; Catherine Leonard; Nancy van Lent; Rhodri Saunders Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 2.038