Literature DB >> 23538178

Cost-effectiveness analysis of early versus late total hip replacement in Italy.

Rubén Ernesto Mújica Mota1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of early primary total hip replacement (THR) for functionally independent older adult patients with osteoarthritis (OA) versus 1) nonsurgical therapy followed by THR once the patient has progressed to a functionally dependent state ("delayed THR") and 2) nonsurgical therapy alone ('medical therapy'), from the Italian National Health Service perspective.
METHODS: Individual patient data and evidence from published literature on disease progression, economic costs and THR outcomes in OA, including utilities, perioperative mortality rates, prosthesis survival, and costs of prostheses, THR, rehabilitation, follow-up, revision, and nonsurgical management, combined with population life tables, were synthesized in a Markov model of OA. The model represents the lifetime experience of a patient cohort following their treatment choice, discounting costs and benefits (quality-adjusted life-years) at 3% annually.
RESULTS: At age 65 years, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year of THR over delayed THR was €987 in men and €466 in women; the figures for delayed THR versus medical therapy were €463 and €82, respectively. Among 80-year-olds, early THR is (extended) dominant. With gradual utility loss after primary THR, delaying surgery may be more appealing in women than in men in their 50s, because longer female life expectancy implies longer latter periods of low health-related quality of life (HRQOL) with early THR.
CONCLUSIONS: THR is cost-effective. Patients' HRQOL benefits forgone with delayed THR are worth more than the costs it saves to the Italian National Health Service. This analysis might help to explain women's consistently lower HRQOL by the time of primary operation.
Copyright © 2013 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23538178     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  13 in total

1.  High Risk of Readmission in Octogenarians Undergoing Primary Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Arthur L Malkani; Brian Dilworth; Kevin Ong; Doruk Baykal; Edmund Lau; Theresa N Mackin; Gwo-Chin Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Conservative and operative treatment of working age patients with gonarthritis. Economic considerations].

Authors:  J Malzahn
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  The impact of surgical trainee involvement in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of surgical efficacy, patient safety, and outcomes.

Authors:  Ryan S Marder; Ian Gopie; Chibuokem P Ikwuazom; Declan Tozzi; Neil V Shah; Qais Naziri; Aditya V Maheshwari
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-06-05

4.  Clinical and cost-effectiveness of Knee Arthroplasty versus Joint Distraction for Osteoarthritis (KARDS): protocol for a multicentre, phase III, randomised control trial.

Authors:  Cerys Joyce Tassinari; Ruchi Higham; Isabelle Louise Smith; Susanne Arnold; Ruben Mujica-Mota; Andrew Metcalfe; Hamish Simpson; David Murray; Dennis G McGonagle; Hemant Sharma; Thomas William Hamilton; David R Ellard; Catherine Fernandez; Catherine Reynolds; Paul Harwood; Julie Croft; Deborah D Stocken; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Comparison of a fast track protocol and standard care after hip arthroplasty in the reduction of the length of stay and the early weight-bearing resumption: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Martina Rocchi; Cesare Stagni; Marco Govoni; Alessandro Mazzotta; Leonardo Vivarelli; Antonella Orlandi Magli; Mariada Perrone; Maria Grazia Benedetti; Dante Dallari
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Has Metal-On-Metal Resurfacing Been a Cost-Effective Intervention for Health Care Providers?-A Registry Based Study.

Authors:  Ruth Pulikottil-Jacob; Martin Connock; Ngianga-Bakwin Kandala; Hema Mistry; Amy Grove; Karoline Freeman; Matthew Costa; Paul Sutcliffe; Aileen Clarke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Cost-effectiveness of surgical interventions for the management of osteoarthritis: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Hanin Kamaruzaman; Philip Kinghorn; Raymond Oppong
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  Understanding cost-utility analysis studies in the trauma and orthopaedic surgery literature.

Authors:  Achi Kamaraj; Nikhil Agarwal; K T Matthew Seah; Wasim Khan
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-05-04

9.  Stress shielding effects of two prosthetic groups after total hip joint simulation replacement.

Authors:  Chengdong Piao; Dankai Wu; Min Luo; Hongshun Ma
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Estimating the Societal Benefits of THA After Accounting for Work Status and Productivity: A Markov Model Approach.

Authors:  Lane Koenig; Qian Zhang; Matthew S Austin; Berna Demiralp; Thomas K Fehring; Chaoling Feng; Richard C Mather; Jennifer T Nguyen; Asha Saavoss; Bryan D Springer; Adolph J Yates
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.