| Literature DB >> 23537708 |
Xi Zhang1, Yunlong Li, Yanqi Zhang, Xinghua Chen, Cheng Zhang, Li Gao, Peiyan Kong, Yao Liu, Qin Wen, Yunjing Zeng, Qingyu Wang, Yi Su, Chunsen Wang, Sanbin Wang, Zhong Yuan, Lei Gao.
Abstract
In a well-controlled multi-center randomized trial in southwestern China, 228 patients with refractory or relapsed AML were received a low-dose CAG regimen either with etoposide (E-CAG) or without etoposide (CAG). The complete remission (CR) rate, overall survival (OS) and toxicity were evaluated. Patients with E-CAG had a higher CR rate (71.1% vs. CAG 50.9%, P=0.0002). The tolerability appeared to be equivalent. Patients with CR who underwent allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) had a higher five-year OS over those without allo-HSCT (73.8% vs. 10.8%, P=0.000). The E-CAG regimen is expected to become a bridge between relapsed or refractory AML and allo-HSCT.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23537708 DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2013.03.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leuk Res ISSN: 0145-2126 Impact factor: 3.156