Literature DB >> 23536603

Reception and learning of electric fields in bees.

Uwe Greggers1, Gesche Koch, Viola Schmidt, Aron Dürr, Amalia Floriou-Servou, David Piepenbrock, Martin C Göpfert, Randolf Menzel.   

Abstract

Honeybees, like other insects, accumulate electric charge in flight, and when their body parts are moved or rubbed together. We report that bees emit constant and modulated electric fields when flying, landing, walking and during the waggle dance. The electric fields emitted by dancing bees consist of low- and high-frequency components. Both components induce passive antennal movements in stationary bees according to Coulomb's law. Bees learn both the constant and the modulated electric field components in the context of appetitive proboscis extension response conditioning. Using this paradigm, we identify mechanoreceptors in both joints of the antennae as sensors. Other mechanoreceptors on the bee body are potentially involved but are less sensitive. Using laser vibrometry, we show that the electrically charged flagellum is moved by constant and modulated electric fields and more strongly so if sound and electric fields interact. Recordings from axons of the Johnston organ document its sensitivity to electric field stimuli. Our analyses identify electric fields emanating from the surface charge of bees as stimuli for mechanoreceptors, and as biologically relevant stimuli, which may play a role in social communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23536603      PMCID: PMC3619523          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  15 in total

1.  Active auditory mechanics in mosquitoes.

Authors:  M C Göpfert; D Robert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Effect of surface material on electrostatic charging of houseflies (Musca domestica L).

Authors:  Daniel F McGonigle; Chris W Jackson
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.845

Review 3.  Antennal hearing in insects--new findings, new questions.

Authors:  Björn Nadrowski; Thomas Effertz; Pingkalai R Senthilan; Martin C Göpfert
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Mechanical signatures of transducer gating in the Drosophila ear.

Authors:  Jörg T Albert; Björn Nadrowski; Martin C Göpfert
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Drosophila mechanotransduction--linking proteins and functions.

Authors:  Jörg T Albert; Björn Nadrowski; Martin C Göpfert
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 2.160

6.  [Recording of motor activity in animals by means of body surface charges].

Authors:  G Altmann; U Warnke
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1973-08-15

7.  Classical conditioning of proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  M E Bitterman; R Menzel; A Fietz; S Schäfer
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Transducer-based force generation explains active process in Drosophila hearing.

Authors:  Björn Nadrowski; Jörg T Albert; Martin C Göpfert
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Beeping and piping: characterization of two mechano-acoustic signals used by honey bees in swarming.

Authors:  Thomas Schlegel; P Kirk Visscher; Thomas D Seeley
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-11-13

10.  Dynamic range compression in the honey bee auditory system toward waggle dance sounds.

Authors:  Seiya Tsujiuchi; Elena Sivan-Loukianova; Daniel F Eberl; Yasuo Kitagawa; Tatsuhiko Kadowaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  16 in total

1.  Consequences of electrical conductivity in an orb spider's capture web.

Authors:  Fritz Vollrath; Donald Edmonds
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-12-10

2.  Electric fields of flowers stimulate the sensory hairs of bumble bees.

Authors:  Harold H Zakon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Mechanosensory hairs in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) detect weak electric fields.

Authors:  Gregory P Sutton; Dominic Clarke; Erica L Morley; Daniel Robert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Exposure to static electric fields leads to changes in biogenic amine levels in the brains of Drosophila.

Authors:  Philip L Newland; Mesfer S Al Ghamdi; Suleiman Sharkh; Hitoshi Aonuma; Christopher W Jackson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Vision and air flow combine to streamline flying honeybees.

Authors:  Gavin J Taylor; Tien Luu; David Ball; Mandyam V Srinivasan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Bee positive: the importance of electroreception in pollinator cognitive ecology.

Authors:  Mathieu Lihoreau; Nigel E Raine
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-17

Review 7.  The bee, the flower, and the electric field: electric ecology and aerial electroreception.

Authors:  Dominic Clarke; Erica Morley; Daniel Robert
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Electric Fields Elicit Ballooning in Spiders.

Authors:  Erica L Morley; Daniel Robert
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  Potential Risk to Pollinators from Nanotechnology-Based Pesticides.

Authors:  Louisa A Hooven; Priyadarshini Chakrabarti; Bryan J Harper; Ramesh R Sagili; Stacey L Harper
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 10.  Neuroethology of the Waggle Dance: How Followers Interact with the Waggle Dancer and Detect Spatial Information.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Ai; Ryuichi Okada; Midori Sakura; Thomas Wachtler; Hidetoshi Ikeno
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.769

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.