Literature DB >> 23535617

The effects of selective history and environmental heterogeneity on inbreeding depression in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Tristan A F Long1, Locke Rowe, Aneil F Agrawal.   

Abstract

Inbreeding depression varies considerably among populations, but only some aspects of this variation have been thoroughly studied. Because inbreeding depression requires genetic variation, factors that influence the amount of standing variation can affect the magnitude of inbreeding depression. Environmental heterogeneity has long been considered an important contributor to the maintenance of genetic variation, but its effects on inbreeding depression have been largely ignored by empiricists. Here we compare inbreeding depression, measured in two environments, for 20 experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster that have been maintained under four different selection regimes, including two types of environmentally homogeneous selection and two types environmentally heterogeneous selection. In line with theory, we find considerably higher inbreeding depression in populations from heterogeneous selection regimes. We also use our data set to test whether inbreeding depression is correlated with either stress or the phenotypic coefficient of variation (CV), as suggested by some recent studies. Though both of these factors are significant predictors of inbreeding depression in our study, there is an effect of assay environment on inbreeding depression that cannot be explained by either stress or CV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23535617     DOI: 10.1086/669675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  9 in total

1.  Interactions of inbreeding and stress by poor host quality in a root hemiparasite.

Authors:  Tobias Michael Sandner; Diethart Matthies
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Meta-analytic evidence that animals rarely avoid inbreeding.

Authors:  Raïssa A de Boer; Regina Vega-Trejo; Alexander Kotrschal; John L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 15.460

3.  Indirect selection of thermal tolerance during experimental evolution of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Catriona Condon; Ajjya Acharya; Gregory J Adrian; Alex M Hurliman; David Malekooti; Phivu Nguyen; Maximilian H Zelic; Michael J Angilletta
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Evolution of ageing as a tangle of trade-offs: energy versus function.

Authors:  Alexei A Maklakov; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Yeasts affect tolerance of Drosophila melanogaster to food substrate with high NaCl concentration.

Authors:  A S Dmitrieva; S B Ivnitsky; I A Maksimova; P L Panchenko; A V Kachalkin; A V Markov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Environmental versus anthropogenic effects on population adaptive divergence in the freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis.

Authors:  Anthony Bouétard; Jessica Côte; Anne-Laure Besnard; Marc Collinet; Marie-Agnès Coutellec
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genome-wide patterns of genetic variation within and among alternative selective regimes.

Authors:  Yuheng Huang; Stephen I Wright; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Experimental Evolution of Gene Expression and Plasticity in Alternative Selective Regimes.

Authors:  Yuheng Huang; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 9.  Sex-specific inbreeding depression: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Regina Vega-Trejo; Raïssa A de Boer; John L Fitzpatrick; Alexander Kotrschal
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 11.274

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.