Literature DB >> 23535391

Application and clinical utility of the Glasgow Coma Scale over time: a study employing the NIDRR traumatic brain injury model systems database.

Marie D Barker1, John Whyte, Christopher R Pretz, Mark Sherer, Nancy Temkin, Flora M Hammond, Zabedah Saad, Thomas Novack.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine possible changes in Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores related to changes in emergency management, such as intubation and chemical paralysis, and the potential impact on outcome prediction. PARTICIPANTS: 10 228 patients from the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems national database.
DESIGN: Retrospective study examining 5-year epochs from 1987 to 2012. MAIN MEASURES: GCS score assessed in the Emergency Department (GCS scores for intubated, but not paralyzed, patients were estimated with a formula using 2 of the 3 GCS components), Outcome: Functional Independence Measure (FIM) assessed at rehabilitation admission.
RESULTS: The rate of intubation prior to GCS scoring averaged 43% and did not increase across time. However, a clear increase over time was observed in the use of paralytics or heavy sedatives, with 27% of patients receiving this intervention in the most recent epoch. Estimated GCS scores classified 69% of intubated patients as severely brain injured and 8% as mildly injured. The GCS accounted for a modest, yet consistent, amount of variability (approximately 5%-7%) in FIM scores during most epochs.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the frequency of intubation and/or paralysis following brain injury in this sample, estimating GCS or exploring other means to gauge injury severity is beneficial, particularly because a portion likely did not sustain severe brain injury. There is no evidence for declining predictive utility of the GCS over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23535391     DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e31828a0a45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil        ISSN: 0885-9701            Impact factor:   2.710


  4 in total

1.  Neurologic Functional and Quality of Life Outcomes after TBI: Clinic Attendees versus Non-Attendees.

Authors:  Mayur B Patel; Laura D Wilson; Jana A Bregman; Taylor C Leath; Stephen S Humble; Mario A Davidson; Michael R de Riesthal; Oscar D Guillamondegui
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Volumetric analysis of day of injury computed tomography is associated with rehabilitation outcomes after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Sarah Majercik; Joseph Bledsoe; David Ryser; Ramona O Hopkins; Joseph E Fair; R Brock Frost; Joel MacDonald; Ryan Barrett; Susan Horn; David Pisani; Erin D Bigler; Scott Gardner; Mark Stevens; Michael J Larson
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.313

3.  Effects of Patient Preinjury and Injury Characteristics on Acute Rehabilitation Outcomes for Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  John D Corrigan; Susan D Horn; Ryan S Barrett; Randall J Smout; Jennifer Bogner; Flora M Hammond; Murray E Brandstater; Sarah Majercik
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 4.  Assessing the Severity of Traumatic Brain Injury-Time for a Change?

Authors:  Olli Tenovuo; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Lee E Goldstein; David J Sharp; Joukje van der Naalt; Nathan D Zasler
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.