Literature DB >> 23535250

Dose absorption in lumbar and femoral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry examinations using three different scan modalities: an anthropomorphic phantom study.

Michele Bandirali1, Ezio Lanza2, Carmelo Messina2, Luca Maria Sconfienza3, Roberto Brambilla4, Rozza Maurizio4, Daniele Marchelli5, Luca Petruccio Piodi5, Giovanni Di Leo6, Fabio Massimo Ulivieri5, Francesco Sardanelli3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to measure the effective dose on an anthropomorphic phantom undergoing lumbar and femoral dual energy X-ray absorption (DXA) examinations, using 3 different scan modalities (fast-array [FA], array [A], high-definition [HD]), and assess the differences in the lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of cancer due to radiation. An anthropomorphic phantom was used. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed over 12 anatomic phantom regions and outside the room (to measure background radiation). Fifty scans on the femur and spine were performed for each mode. The dose relative to a single DXA scan for each dosimeter was measured (mean over the 50 scans) and the background radiation was then subtracted. The equivalent dose per organ was obtained. The total body effective dose was calculated by adding the equivalent doses. We estimated the lifetime dose absorption and LAR for cancer for a male and a female patient undergoing 36 DXA studies (18 lumbar, 18 femoral) every 21 months for 32 years. The effective dose for lumbar scans was FA = 17.79 μSv, A = 32.88 μSv, HD = 31.08 μSv; for femoral scans, FA = 5.29 μSv, A = 9.55 μSv, HD = 7.54 μSv. LAR estimation showed a minimal increase in cancer risk (range 4.55 × 10⁻⁴% [FA, femoral, male] to 4.02 × 10⁻³% [A, lumbar, female]). The lifetime dose absorption and LAR for cancer for a male and a female patient undergoing 36 DXA studies (18 lumbar, 18 femoral) every 21 months for 32 years were 0.756 mSv, 3.82 × 10(-3)% and 0.756 mSv, 5.11 × 10⁻³%, respectively. DXA examinations cause radiation levels that are comparable to the background radiation. Regardless of the scan modality or the anatomic site, a patient undergoing DXA scans for a lifetime has a negligible increased risk of developing cancer.
Copyright © 2013 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthropomorphic phantom; dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; radiation exposure

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23535250     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  10 in total

1.  Short-term precision assessment of trabecular bone score and bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with different scan modes: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Michele Bandirali; Alessandro Poloni; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Carmelo Messina; Giacomo Davide Edoardo Papini; Marcello Petrini; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Reproducibility of trabecular bone score with different scan modes using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: a phantom study.

Authors:  Michele Bandirali; Giovanni Di Leo; Carmelo Messina; Maria Juana Pastor Lopez; Alessandro Mai; Fabio M Ulivieri; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  A new diagnostic score to detect osteoporosis in patients undergoing lumbar spine MRI.

Authors:  Michele Bandirali; Giovanni Di Leo; Giacomo Davide Edoardo Papini; Carmelo Messina; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Guidelines for the assessment of bone density and microarchitecture in vivo using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  D E Whittier; S K Boyd; A J Burghardt; J Paccou; A Ghasem-Zadeh; R Chapurlat; K Engelke; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Osteosarcopenia-The Role of Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in Diagnostics.

Authors:  Aleksandra Gonera-Furman; Marek Bolanowski; Diana Jędrzejuk
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 6.  Diagnostic imaging of osteoporosis and sarcopenia: a narrative review.

Authors:  Carmelo Messina; Gabriele Maffi; Jacopo Antonino Vitale; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

Review 7.  Imaging of metabolic bone disease.

Authors:  Maria Mattera; Alfonso Reginelli; Silvia Bartollino; Claudio Russo; Antonio Barile; Domenico Albano; Giovanni Mauri; Carmelo Messina; Salvatore Cappabianca; Giuseppe Guglielmi
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2018-01-19

8.  Assessment of Osteoporosis in Lumbar Spine: In Vivo Quantitative MR Imaging of Collagen Bound Water in Trabecular Bone.

Authors:  Jin Liu; Jian-Wei Liao; Wei Li; Xiao-Jun Chen; Jia-Xin Feng; Lin Yao; Pan-Hui Huang; Zhi-Hai Su; Hai Lu; Yu-Ting Liao; Shao-Lin Li; Ya-Jun Ma
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 9.  The clinical application of high-resolution peripheral computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in adults: state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  J P van den Bergh; P Szulc; A M Cheung; M Bouxsein; K Engelke; R Chapurlat
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Current Applications and Selected Technical Details of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

Authors:  Piotr Sawicki; Marek Tałałaj; Katarzyna Życińska; Wojciech S Zgliczyński; Waldemar Wierzba
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-06-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.