CONTEXT: Pituitary stalk lesions have various etiologies, often not clinically apparent. Pathological samples from these lesions are rarely obtained, because of the critical location and function of the hypophyseal stalk. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize the etiological spectrum of pituitary stalk lesions seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester over 20 years and to determine whether specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics could provide clinician guidance with regard to the etiology of infundibular lesions. DESIGN: A retrospective review of patients with pituitary stalk lesions seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1987 and 2006 was conducted. Demographic, clinical presentation, imaging, laboratory, operative, and pathology data were reviewed and are reported using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of the 152 pituitary stalk lesions included, 49 (32%) were neoplastic, 30 (20%) were inflammatory, 13 (9%) were congenital anomalies, and 60 (39%) were of unclear etiology. Diabetes insipidus was diagnosed in 43 (28%) of the 152 patients, and 49 (32%) patients had at least one anterior pituitary hormone deficit. Secondary hypogonadism was the most common endocrine deficiency. Eleven of 13 congenital lesions were round in appearance and 5 of 7 patients with neurosarcoidosis confirmed by pathology had a uniformly thickened pituitary stalk on MRI. There were no statistically significant correlations between hypopituitarism and the pattern of enhancement or size of the lesion. CONCLUSIONS: Findings on MRI remain key in guiding the diagnosis of pituitary stalk lesions, particularly when used in conjunction with other clinical clues. There are no good imaging predictors for hypopituitarism, making clinical evaluation of all patients with pituitary stalk lesions crucial.
CONTEXT: Pituitary stalk lesions have various etiologies, often not clinically apparent. Pathological samples from these lesions are rarely obtained, because of the critical location and function of the hypophyseal stalk. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize the etiological spectrum of pituitary stalk lesions seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester over 20 years and to determine whether specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics could provide clinician guidance with regard to the etiology of infundibular lesions. DESIGN: A retrospective review of patients with pituitary stalk lesions seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1987 and 2006 was conducted. Demographic, clinical presentation, imaging, laboratory, operative, and pathology data were reviewed and are reported using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of the 152 pituitary stalk lesions included, 49 (32%) were neoplastic, 30 (20%) were inflammatory, 13 (9%) were congenital anomalies, and 60 (39%) were of unclear etiology. Diabetes insipidus was diagnosed in 43 (28%) of the 152 patients, and 49 (32%) patients had at least one anterior pituitary hormone deficit. Secondary hypogonadism was the most common endocrine deficiency. Eleven of 13 congenital lesions were round in appearance and 5 of 7 patients with neurosarcoidosis confirmed by pathology had a uniformly thickened pituitary stalk on MRI. There were no statistically significant correlations between hypopituitarism and the pattern of enhancement or size of the lesion. CONCLUSIONS: Findings on MRI remain key in guiding the diagnosis of pituitary stalk lesions, particularly when used in conjunction with other clinical clues. There are no good imaging predictors for hypopituitarism, making clinical evaluation of all patients with pituitary stalk lesions crucial.
Authors: Amit Mahajan; Richard A Bronen; Ali Y Mian; Sacit Bulent Omay; Dennis D Spencer; Silvio E Inzucchi Journal: Endocrine Date: 2020-03-11 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Lazar Tosic; Stefanos Voglis; Anna Maria Reuss; Elisabeth Jane Rushing; Luca Regli; Carlo Serra Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2021-11-20 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Arturo Vega-Beyhart; Irene Rocío Medina-Rangel; Andrea Hinojosa-Azaola; Milagros Fernández-Barrio; Ana Sofía Vargas-Castro; Lucía García-Inciarte; Alberto Guzmán-Pérez; Tania Raisha Torres-Victoria; Froylán David Martínez-Sánchez; Mireya Citlali Pérez-Guzmán; José Miguel Hinojosa-Amaya; Andrés León-Suárez; Miguel Angel Gómez-Sámano; Francisco Javier Gómez-Pérez; Daniel Cuevas-Ramos Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2019-08-24 Impact factor: 2.980