Literature DB >> 2353314

Prevention of unnecessary pregnancy terminations by counselling women on drug, chemical, and radiation exposure during the first trimester.

G Koren1, A Pastuszak.   

Abstract

As part of a new approach to counselling pregnant women concerned about antenatal exposure to drugs, chemicals, or radiation, we measured their tendency to terminate their pregnancy by using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Analysis of 78 cases where women had less than 50% tendency to continue pregnancy before they were advised by us reveals that 61 decided to continue their pregnancy after the consultation (57 normal, healthy infants, four miscarriages) and 17 terminated. Women who continued their pregnancy significantly changed their tendency after we discussed relevant information with them (from 34.3 +/- 2.5% to 84.5 +/- 3.3%, P less than 0.00001), whereas most of those who eventually terminated pregnancy did not change their tendency to continue pregnancy beyond the 50% mark (from 24.8 +/- 5.4% to 45.1 +/- 9.8%) (P greater than 0.1). Only two of the women who terminated their pregnancy were exposed to teratogenic drugs; however, in most other cases, other obvious reasons, unrelated to the exposure in question, were identified by the women as leading reasons for termination. An appropriate intervention in early pregnancy can prevent unnecessary pregnancy terminations by correcting misinformation and thereby decreasing the unrealistically high perception of risk by women exposed to nonteratogens.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion, Induced--prevention and control; Advisory Services; Behavior; Clinic Activities; Counseling; Drugs--side effects; Family Planning; Fertility Control, Postconception; Organization And Administration; Pregnancy; Pregnancy, First Trimester; Program Activities; Programs; Psychosocial Factors; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Sampling Studies; Studies; Surveys; Treatment

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2353314     DOI: 10.1002/tera.1420410602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Teratology        ISSN: 0040-3709


  11 in total

1.  Essay for the 2011 CIHR/CMAJ award: Motherisk--caring for mothers, protecting the unborn.

Authors:  Gideon Koren; Irena Nulman; Katarina Aleksa; Joey Gareri; Adrienne Einarson; Shinya Ito
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Drug use in pregnancy--physicians' evaluation of quality and clinical impact of drug information centres.

Authors:  Sofia Kristina Frost Widnes; Jan Schjøtt
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Drugs and Birth Defects: a knowledge database providing risk assessments based on national health registers.

Authors:  Ulrika Nörby; Karin Källén; Birgit Eiermann; Seher Korkmaz; Birger Winbladh; Lars L Gustafsson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  We don't know what we don't study: the case for research on medication effects in pregnancy.

Authors:  Melissa A Parisi; Catherine Y Spong; Anne Zajicek; Alan E Guttmacher
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 3.908

5.  Twenty-five years of counseling family physicians: What have we learned?

Authors:  Gideon Koren; Adrienne Einarson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Pregnancy outcome following gestational exposure to fluoroquinolones: a multicenter prospective controlled study.

Authors:  R Loebstein; A Addis; E Ho; R Andreou; S Sage; A E Donnenfeld; B Schick; M Bonati; M Moretti; A Lalkin; A Pastuszak; G Koren
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Teratogenic risk perception and confidence in use of medicines in pairs of pregnant women and general practitioners based on patient information leaflets.

Authors:  Sofia Frost Widnes; Jan Schjøtt; Geir Egil Eide; Anne Gerd Granas
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Bias against the null hypothesis: scaring pregnant women about drugs in pregnancy.

Authors:  Gideon Koren; Svetlana Madjunkova; Caroline Maltepe
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Multiple information sources and consequences of conflicting information about medicine use during pregnancy: a multinational Internet-based survey.

Authors:  Katri Hämeen-Anttila; Hedvig Nordeng; Esa Kokki; Johanna Jyrkkä; Angela Lupattelli; Kirsti Vainio; Hannes Enlund
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Prevalence and predictors of antidepressant use in a cohort of pregnant women.

Authors:  E Ramos; D Oraichi; E Rey; L Blais; A Bérard
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 6.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.