Literature DB >> 23532407

Transgene delivery via intracellular electroporetic nanoinjection.

Aubrey M Wilson1, Quentin T Aten, Nathan C Toone, Justin L Black, Brian D Jensen, Susan Tamowski, Larry L Howell, Sandra H Burnett.   

Abstract

Development of an effective cytoplasmic delivery technique has remained an elusive goal for decades despite the success of pronuclear microinjection. Cytoplasmic injections are faster and easier than pronuclear injection and do not require the pronuclei to be visible; yet previous attempts to develop cytoplasmic injection have met with limited success. In this work we report a cytoplasmic delivery method termed intracellular electroporetic nanoinjection (IEN). IEN is unique in that it manipulates transgenes using electrical forces. The microelectromechanical system (MEMS) uses electrostatic charge to physically pick up transgenes and place them in the cytoplasm. The transgenes are then propelled through the cytoplasm and electroporated into the pronuclei using electrical pulses. Standard electroporation of whole embryos has not resulted in transgenic animals, but the MEMS device allows localized electroporation to occur within the cytoplasm for transgene delivery from the cytoplasm to the pronucleus. In this report we describe the principles which allow localized electroporation of the pronuclei including: the location of mouse pronuclei between 21 and 28 h post-hCG treatment, modeling data predicting the voltages needed for localized electroporation of pronuclei, and data on electric-field-driven movement of transgenes. We further report results of an IEN versus microinjection comparative study in which IEN produced transgenic pups with viability, transgene integration, and expression rates statistically comparable to microinjection. The ability to perform injections without visualizing or puncturing the pronuclei will widely benefit transgenic research, and will be particularly advantageous for the production of transgenic animals with embryos exhibiting reduced pronuclear visibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23532407     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-013-9706-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  17 in total

1.  Efficient delivery of dsRNA into zona-enclosed mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos by electroporation.

Authors:  Joanna B Grabarek; Berenika Plusa; David M Glover; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 2.  Pronuclear microinjection.

Authors:  R J Wall
Journal:  Cloning Stem Cells       Date:  2001

3.  Nanoinjection: pronuclear DNA delivery using a charged lance.

Authors:  Quentin T Aten; Brian D Jensen; Susan Tamowski; Aubrey M Wilson; Larry L Howell; Sandra H Burnett
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 4.  Temporal regulation of the first mitosis in Xenopus and mouse embryos.

Authors:  Jacek Z Kubiak; Franck Chesnel; Laurent Richard-Parpaillon; Franck Bazile; Aude Pascal; Zbigniew Polanski; Marta Sikora-Polaczek; Zuzanna Maciejewska; Maria A Ciemerych
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.102

Review 5.  Electroporation of cell membranes.

Authors:  T Y Tsong
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  The first cleavage of the mouse zygote predicts the blastocyst axis.

Authors:  Berenika Plusa; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis; Dionne Gray; Karolina Piotrowska-Nitsche; Agnieszka Jedrusik; Virginia E Papaioannou; David M Glover; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  SWR: an inbred strain suitable for generating transgenic mice.

Authors:  G E Osman; D P Jacobson; S W Li; L E Hood; H D Liggitt; W C Ladiges
Journal:  Lab Anim Sci       Date:  1997-04

8.  Production of transgenic rabbits, sheep and pigs by microinjection.

Authors:  R E Hammer; V G Pursel; C E Rexroad; R J Wall; D J Bolt; K M Ebert; R D Palmiter; R L Brinster
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Jun 20-26       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Factors affecting the efficiency of introducing foreign DNA into mice by microinjecting eggs.

Authors:  R L Brinster; H Y Chen; M E Trumbauer; M K Yagle; R D Palmiter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Production of functional transgenic mice by DNA pronuclear microinjection.

Authors:  Anna B Auerbach
Journal:  Acta Biochim Pol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.149

View more
  3 in total

1.  The meganuclease I-SceI containing nuclear localization signal (NLS-I-SceI) efficiently mediated mammalian germline transgenesis via embryo cytoplasmic microinjection.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Xiao-Yang Zhou; Peng-Ying Xiang; Lu-Lu Wang; Huan Tang; Fei Xie; Liang Li; Hong Wei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The effect of injection speed and serial injection on propidium iodide entry into cultured HeLa and primary neonatal fibroblast cells using lance array nanoinjection.

Authors:  John W Sessions; Tyler E Lewis; Craig S Skousen; Sandra Hope; Brian D Jensen
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-07-15

3.  CRISPR-Cas9 directed knock-out of a constitutively expressed gene using lance array nanoinjection.

Authors:  John W Sessions; Craig S Skousen; Kevin D Price; Brad W Hanks; Sandra Hope; Jonathan K Alder; Brian D Jensen
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-09-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.