Literature DB >> 23531601

Sensitivity of scalp 10-20 EEG and magnetoencephalography.

Yosuke Kakisaka1, Rafeed Alkawadri, Zhong I Wang, Rei Enatsu, John C Mosher, Anne-Sophie Dubarry, Andreas V Alexopoulos, Richard C Burgess.   

Abstract

Although previous studies have investigated the sensitivity of electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) to detect spikes by comparing simultaneous recordings, there are no published reports that focus on the relationship between spike dipole orientation or sensitivity of scalp EEG/MEG and the "gold standard" of intracranial recording (stereotactic EEG). We evaluated two patients with focal epilepsy; one with lateral temporal focus and the other with insular focus. Two MEG recordings were performed for both patients, each recorded simultaneously with initially scalp EEG, based on international 10-20 electrode placement with additional electrodes for anterior temporal regions, and subsequently stereotactic EEG. Localisation of MEG spike dipoles from both studies was concordant and all MEG spikes were detected by stereotactic EEG. For the patient with lateral temporal epilepsy, spike sensitivity of MEG and scalp EEG (relative to stereotactic EEG) was 55 and 0%, respectively. Of note, in this case, MEG spike dipoles were oriented tangentially to scalp surface in a tight cluster; the angle of the spike dipole to the vertical line was 3.6 degrees. For the patient with insular epilepsy, spike sensitivity of MEG and scalp EEG (relative to stereotactic EEG) was 83 and 44%, respectively; the angle of the spike dipole to the vertical line was 45.3 degrees. For the patient with lateral temporal epilepsy, tangential spikes from the lateral temporal cortex were difficult to detect based on scalp 10-20 EEG and for the patient with insular epilepsy, it was possible to evaluate operculum insular sources using MEG. We believe that these findings may be important for the interpretation of clinical EEG and MEG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electroencephalography (EEG); magnetoencephalography; sensitivity; stereotactic EEG (SEEG)

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23531601      PMCID: PMC3988277          DOI: 10.1684/epd.2013.0554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epileptic Disord        ISSN: 1294-9361            Impact factor:   1.819


  10 in total

1.  Magnetic source imaging versus intracranial electroencephalogram in epilepsy surgery: a prospective study.

Authors:  Robert C Knowlton; Rotem Elgavish; Jennifer Howell; Jeffery Blount; Jorge G Burneo; Edward Faught; Pongkiat Kankirawatana; Kristen Riley; Richard Morawetz; Julie Worthington; Ruben I Kuzniecky
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 2.  Combining MEG and EEG source modeling in epilepsy evaluations.

Authors:  John S Ebersole; Susan M Ebersole
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.177

3.  Simultaneous recording of epileptiform discharges by MEG and subdural electrodes in temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  N Mikuni; T Nagamine; A Ikeda; K Terada; W Taki; J Kimura; H Kikuchi; H Shibasaki
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Interictal magnetoencephalography and the irritative zone in the electrocorticogram.

Authors:  Z Agirre-Arrizubieta; G J M Huiskamp; C H Ferrier; A C van Huffelen; F S S Leijten
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Voxel-based morphometric MRI post-processing in MRI-negative focal cortical dysplasia followed by simultaneously recorded MEG and stereo-EEG.

Authors:  Z I Wang; S E Jones; A J Ristic; C Wong; Y Kakisaka; K Jin; F Schneider; J A Gonzalez-Martinez; J C Mosher; D Nair; R C Burgess; I M Najm; A V Alexopoulos
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 3.045

6.  Detection of epileptiform activity by human interpreters: blinded comparison between electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Masaki Iwasaki; Elia Pestana; Richard C Burgess; Hans O Lüders; Hiroshi Shamoto; Nobukazu Nakasato
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.864

7.  Epileptic spikes: magnetoencephalography versus simultaneous electrocorticography.

Authors:  Makoto Oishi; Hiroshi Otsubo; Shigeki Kameyama; Nobuhito Morota; Hiroshi Masuda; Masaomi Kitayama; Ryuichi Tanaka
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.864

8.  Magnetoencephalography in fronto-parietal opercular epilepsy.

Authors:  Yosuke Kakisaka; Masaki Iwasaki; Andreas V Alexopoulos; Rei Enatsu; Kazutaka Jin; Zhong I Wang; John C Mosher; Anne-Sophie Dubarry; Dileep R Nair; Richard C Burgess
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.045

9.  Localization of abnormal discharges causing insular epilepsy by magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Hyeon-Mi Park; Nobukazu Nakasato; Teiji Tominaga
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Simultaneous magnetoencephalography and intracranial EEG registration: technical and clinical aspects.

Authors:  Marta Santiuste; Rafal Nowak; Antonio Russi; Thais Tarancon; Bartolome Oliver; Emilio Ayats; Gabriela Scheler; Galleon Graetz
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.177

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Assessment of the Utility of Ictal Magnetoencephalography in the Localization of the Epileptic Seizure Onset Zone.

Authors:  Rafeed Alkawadri; Richard C Burgess; Yosuke Kakisaka; John C Mosher; Andreas V Alexopoulos
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 18.302

2.  Insular Involvement in Cases of Epilepsy Surgery Failure.

Authors:  Jimmy Li; Sandra Reiter-Campeau; Dina Namiranian; Dènahin Hinnoutondji Toffa; Alain Bouthillier; François Dubeau; Dang Khoa Nguyen
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-18

3.  Magnetoencephalographic signatures of insular epileptic spikes based on functional connectivity.

Authors:  Younes Zerouali; Philippe Pouliot; Manon Robert; Ismail Mohamed; Alain Bouthillier; Frédéric Lesage; Dang K Nguyen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  MEG-EEG Information Fusion and Electromagnetic Source Imaging: From Theory to Clinical Application in Epilepsy.

Authors:  Rasheda Arman Chowdhury; Younes Zerouali; Tanguy Hedrich; Marcel Heers; Eliane Kobayashi; Jean-Marc Lina; Christophe Grova
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 5.  EEG-Based Emotion Recognition: A State-of-the-Art Review of Current Trends and Opportunities.

Authors:  Nazmi Sofian Suhaimi; James Mountstephens; Jason Teo
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.