OBJECTIVE: To document central corneal thickness (CCT) and power measurements in pigmented and white rabbits using Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and the Humphrey ATLAS Corneal Topography System (HACTS). ANIMAL STUDIED: Fourteen female rabbits (seven pigmented and seven white rabbits) were involved in this study. PROCEDURE: Twenty-eight eyes underwent AS-OCT and HACTS examination. Central corneal thickness, corneal power in the steepest and flattest meridians, astigmatism, pupil diameter (PD), and white-to-white (WTW) were calculated. RESULTS: The CCT was 390 ± 14.2 and 373 ± 7.2 μm for pigmented and white rabbits, respectively. The CCT values showed statistical difference between the two breeds (P = 0.017). The corneal power in the steepest meridian was 44.6 ± 1.9 Diopter (D) in pigmented rabbits and 47.8 ± 1.5 D in white rabbits. The corneal power in the flattest meridian was 44.0 ± 2.1 D in pigmented rabbits and 47.4 ± 1.5 D in white rabbits. The astigmatism, PD, and WTW values were 0.6 ± 0.22 D, 7.9 ± 0.9, and 14.5 ± 0.1 mm in pigmented rabbits, respectively. The corresponding values in white rabbits were 0.4 ± 0.23 D, 7.5 ± 0.5, and 13.5 ± 0.2 mm. There was a statistically significant difference in corneal power in the steepest and flattest meridians and for WTW. No such difference was observed for astigmatism or PD between them. CONCLUSIONS: Differences exist in the CCT, corneal power, and WTW between 5-month-old pigmented and white rabbits. Such difference should be considered when designing cornea-related experiments in rabbits.
OBJECTIVE: To document central corneal thickness (CCT) and power measurements in pigmented and white rabbits using Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and the Humphrey ATLAS Corneal Topography System (HACTS). ANIMAL STUDIED: Fourteen female rabbits (seven pigmented and seven white rabbits) were involved in this study. PROCEDURE: Twenty-eight eyes underwent AS-OCT and HACTS examination. Central corneal thickness, corneal power in the steepest and flattest meridians, astigmatism, pupil diameter (PD), and white-to-white (WTW) were calculated. RESULTS: The CCT was 390 ± 14.2 and 373 ± 7.2 μm for pigmented and white rabbits, respectively. The CCT values showed statistical difference between the two breeds (P = 0.017). The corneal power in the steepest meridian was 44.6 ± 1.9 Diopter (D) in pigmented rabbits and 47.8 ± 1.5 D in white rabbits. The corneal power in the flattest meridian was 44.0 ± 2.1 D in pigmented rabbits and 47.4 ± 1.5 D in white rabbits. The astigmatism, PD, and WTW values were 0.6 ± 0.22 D, 7.9 ± 0.9, and 14.5 ± 0.1 mm in pigmented rabbits, respectively. The corresponding values in white rabbits were 0.4 ± 0.23 D, 7.5 ± 0.5, and 13.5 ± 0.2 mm. There was a statistically significant difference in corneal power in the steepest and flattest meridians and for WTW. No such difference was observed for astigmatism or PD between them. CONCLUSIONS: Differences exist in the CCT, corneal power, and WTW between 5-month-old pigmented and white rabbits. Such difference should be considered when designing cornea-related experiments in rabbits.