Literature DB >> 2353099

Rapid MR imaging of blood flow with a phase-sensitive, limited-flip-angle, gradient recalled pulse sequence: preliminary experience.

C E Spritzer1, N J Pelc, J N Lee, A J Evans, H D Sostman, S J Riederer.   

Abstract

To assess blood flow rapidly, a limited-flip-angle, gradient recalled pulse sequence was modified to acquire two views at the same phase-encoding step in successive repetitions. One view is obtained with first-moment flow compensation, while the second view is obtained with selectable flow encoding (non-zero first moment) along one direction. Blood flowing along the encoded direction acquires a phase difference between the two views, resulting in signal dependent on both direction and speed of flow. Stationary tissues undergo no phase change. Therefore, the phase shift between the two views produces an image that spatially renders flow direction and velocity. With a 24-msec repetition time, a 256 X 128 matrix, and two excitations, data acquisition is completed in 13 seconds per location (both a magnitude image and a flow image are produced at each location). Images generated with flow phantoms confirmed the accuracy of this method. Preliminary clinical evidence in 23 human subjects suggests that this method is useful in evaluating portal hypertension, distinguishing arterial from venous flow, distinguishing between slow flow and clot, and confirming the presence of clot. This method appears to be a fast, easy way to assess blood flow in large vessels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2353099     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.176.1.2353099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  11 in total

1.  Abdominal magnetic resonance venography.

Authors:  J P Finn; H E Longmaid
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography.

Authors:  Daniel V Litwiller; Yogesh K Mariappan; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2012

Review 3.  Advances in vascular echoplanar imaging.

Authors:  J F Debatin; D A Leung; S Wildermuth; D Holtz; G C McKinnon
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging and measurement of blood flow.

Authors:  C H McDonnell; R J Herfkens; A M Norbash; G D Rubin
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1994-03

5.  Clinical features associated with internal carotid artery occlusion do not correlate with MRA cerebropetal flow measurements.

Authors:  K J van Everdingen; L J Kappelle; C J Klijn; W P Mali; J van Der Grond
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Chemical shift-induced phase errors in phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Matthew J Middione; Daniel B Ennis
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  The pressure reduction coefficient: A new parameter to assess aneurysmal blood stasis induced by flow diverters/disruptors.

Authors:  Gregory Gascou; Riccardo Ferrara; Dominique Ambard; Mathieu Sanchez; Kyriakos Lobotesis; Franck Jourdan; Vincent Costalat
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 1.610

8.  Phase contrast magnetic resonance of the spinal cord preliminary results in spinal cord arterio-venous malformations.

Authors:  K L Mourier; F Gelbert; D Reizine; P Y Gobin; F Bongioanni; B George; G Lot; J J Merland
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Intracranial magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  P M Ruggieri; T J Masaryk; J S Ross; M T Modic
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Portal blood flow in the presence or absence of diffuse liver disease: measurement by phase contrast MR imaging.

Authors:  N Kashitani; S Kimoto; M Tsunoda; T Ito; T Tsuji; A Ono; Y Hiraki
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1995 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.