Literature DB >> 23530896

Affective and executive network processing associated with persuasive antidrug messages.

Ian S Ramsay1, Marco C Yzer, Monica Luciana, Kathleen D Vohs, Angus W MacDonald.   

Abstract

Previous research has highlighted brain regions associated with socioemotional processes in persuasive message encoding, whereas cognitive models of persuasion suggest that executive brain areas may also be important. The current study aimed to identify lateral prefrontal brain areas associated with persuasive message viewing and understand how activity in these executive regions might interact with activity in the amygdala and medial pFC. Seventy adolescents were scanned using fMRI while they watched 10 strongly convincing antidrug public service announcements (PSAs), 10 weakly convincing antidrug PSAs, and 10 advertisements (ads) unrelated to drugs. Antidrug PSAs compared with nondrug ads more strongly elicited arousal-related activity in the amygdala and medial pFC. Within antidrug PSAs, those that were prerated as strongly persuasive versus weakly persuasive showed significant differences in arousal-related activity in executive processing areas of the lateral pFC. In support of the notion that persuasiveness involves both affective and executive processes, functional connectivity analyses showed greater coactivation between the lateral pFC and amygdala during PSAs known to be strongly (vs. weakly) convincing. These findings demonstrate that persuasive messages elicit activation in brain regions responsible for both emotional arousal and executive control and represent a crucial step toward a better understanding of the neural processes responsible for persuasion and subsequent behavior change.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23530896     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  On the conceptual ambiguity surrounding perceived message effectiveness.

Authors:  Marco Yzer; Susan LoRusso; Rebekah H Nagler
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2015

2.  Perceived Message Effectiveness: Do People Need to Think About Message Effectiveness to Report the Message as Effective?

Authors:  Lucy Popova; Yachao Li
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2022-01-26

3.  Brain Activity in Self- and Value-Related Regions in Response to Online Antismoking Messages Predicts Behavior Change.

Authors:  Nicole Cooper; Steve Tompson; Matthew Brook O'Donnell; Emily B Falk
Journal:  J Media Psychol       Date:  2015-09-15

4.  Brain Responses to Anti-Smoking Health Warnings In Youth.

Authors:  Victoria P Fairchild; Catherine A Aronowitz; Daniel D Langleben; An-Li Wang
Journal:  Curr Addict Rep       Date:  2018-07-19

5.  The persuasion network is modulated by drug-use risk and predicts anti-drug message effectiveness.

Authors:  Richard Huskey; J Michael Mangus; Benjamin O Turner; René Weber
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  A functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) replication of the sunscreen persuasion paradigm.

Authors:  Shannon M Burns; Lianne N Barnes; Perri L Katzman; Daniel L Ames; Emily B Falk; Matthew D Lieberman
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Connectivity between visual and auditory cortices mediates the influence of argument strength on the effectiveness of smoking-cessation videos among smokers low in sensation seeking.

Authors:  Zhenhao Shi; An-Li Wang; Catherine A Aronowitz; Joseph N Cappella; Daniel Romer; Daniel D Langleben
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2019-07-18

8.  Individual Differences in Brain Responses: New Opportunities for Tailoring Health Communication Campaigns.

Authors:  Richard Huskey; Benjamin O Turner; René Weber
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.