BACKGROUND: Most theoretical formulations acknowledge that knowledge and awareness of cancer screening and prevention recommendations significantly influence health behaviors. This study compares perceived knowledge of cancer prevention and screening with test-based knowledge in a community sample. We also examine demographic variables and self-reported cancer screening and prevention behaviors as correlates of both knowledge scores, and consider whether cancer related knowledge can be accurately assessed using just a few, simple questions in a short and easy-to-complete survey. METHODS: We used a community-partnered participatory research approach to develop our study aims and a survey. The study sample was composed of 180 predominantly African American and Hispanic community individuals who participated in a full-day cancer prevention and screening promotion conference in South Los Angeles, California, on July 2011. Participants completed a self-administered survey in English or Spanish at the beginning of the conference. RESULTS: Our data indicate that perceived and test-based knowledge scores are only moderately correlated. Perceived knowledge score shows a stronger association with demographic characteristics and other cancer related variables than the test-based score. Thirteen out of twenty variables that are examined in our study showed a statistically significant correlation with the perceived knowledge score, however, only four variables demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with the test-based knowledge score. CONCLUSION: Perceived knowledge of cancer prevention and screening was assessed with fewer items than test-based knowledge. Thus, using this assessment could potentially reduce respondent burden. However, our data demonstrate that perceived and test-based knowledge are separate constructs.
BACKGROUND: Most theoretical formulations acknowledge that knowledge and awareness of cancer screening and prevention recommendations significantly influence health behaviors. This study compares perceived knowledge of cancer prevention and screening with test-based knowledge in a community sample. We also examine demographic variables and self-reported cancer screening and prevention behaviors as correlates of both knowledge scores, and consider whether cancer related knowledge can be accurately assessed using just a few, simple questions in a short and easy-to-complete survey. METHODS: We used a community-partnered participatory research approach to develop our study aims and a survey. The study sample was composed of 180 predominantly African American and Hispanic community individuals who participated in a full-day cancer prevention and screening promotion conference in South Los Angeles, California, on July 2011. Participants completed a self-administered survey in English or Spanish at the beginning of the conference. RESULTS: Our data indicate that perceived and test-based knowledge scores are only moderately correlated. Perceived knowledge score shows a stronger association with demographic characteristics and other cancer related variables than the test-based score. Thirteen out of twenty variables that are examined in our study showed a statistically significant correlation with the perceived knowledge score, however, only four variables demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with the test-based knowledge score. CONCLUSION: Perceived knowledge of cancer prevention and screening was assessed with fewer items than test-based knowledge. Thus, using this assessment could potentially reduce respondent burden. However, our data demonstrate that perceived and test-based knowledge are separate constructs.
Authors: Zahava Berkowitz; Nikki A Hawkins; Lucy A Peipins; Mary C White; Marion R Nadel Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-12-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Gustavo D Cruz; Racquel Z Le Geros; Jamie S Ostroff; Jennifer L Hay; Herbert Kenigsberg; D Mercedes Franklin Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 3.634
Authors: Georgia R Sadler; Celine M Ko; Jennifer A Cohn; Monique White; Rai-nesha Weldon; Phillis Wu Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2007-04-17 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Anna Lucas-Wright; Mohsen Bazargan; Loretta Jones; Jaydutt V Vadgama; Roberto Vargas; Marianna Sarkissyan; James Smith; Hamed Yazdanshenas; Annette E Maxwell Journal: J Community Health Date: 2014-02
Authors: Nazleen Bharmal; Anna Aziza Lucas-Wright; Stefanie D Vassar; Felica Jones; Loretta Jones; Rebekah Wells; Jason Cienega; Arleen F Brown Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2016
Authors: Malcolm Bevel; Oluwole A Babatunde; Sue P Heiney; Heather M Brandt; Michael D Wirth; Thomas G Hurley; Samira Khan; Hiluv Johnson; Cassandra M Wineglass; Tatiana Y Warren; E Angela Murphy; Erica Sercy; Amanda S Thomas; James R Hébert; Swann Arp Adams Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 1.847