Literature DB >> 23530096

Outcome prediction in primary resected retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: histology-specific overall survival and disease-free survival nomograms built on major sarcoma center data sets.

Alessandro Gronchi1, Rosalba Miceli, Elizabeth Shurell, Fritz C Eilber, Frederick R Eilber, Daniel A Anaya, Michael W Kattan, Charles Honoré, Dina C Lev, Chiara Colombo, Sylvie Bonvalot, Luigi Mariani, Raphael E Pollock.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Integration of numerous prognostic variables not included in the conventional staging of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas (RPS) is essential in providing effective treatment. The purpose of this study was to build a specific nomogram for predicting postoperative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with primary RPS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data registered in three institutional prospective sarcoma databases were used. We included patients with primary localized RPS resected between 1999 and 2009. Univariate (Kaplan and Meier plots) and multivariate (Cox model) analyses were carried out. The a priori chosen prognostic covariates were age, tumor size, grade, histologic subtype, multifocality, quality of surgery, and radiation therapy. External validation was performed by applying the nomograms to the patients of an external cohort. The model's discriminative ability was estimated by means of the bootstrap-corrected Harrell C statistic.
RESULTS: In all, 523 patients were identified at the three institutions (developing set). At a median follow-up of 45 months (interquartile range, 22 to 72 months), 171 deaths were recorded. Five- and 7-year OS rates were 56.8% (95% CI, 51.4% to 62.6%) and 46.7% (95% CI, 39.9% to 54.6%. Two hundred twenty-one patients had disease recurrence. Five- and 7-year DFS rates were 39.4% (95% CI, 34.5% to 45.0%) and 35.7% (95% CI, 30.3% to 42.1%). The validation set consisted of 135 patients who were identified at the fourth institution for external validation. The bootstrap-corrected Harrell C statistics for OS and DFS were 0.74 and 0.71 in the developing set and 0.68 and 0.69 in the validating set.
CONCLUSION: These nomograms accurately predict OS and DFS. They should be used for patient counseling in clinical practice and stratification in clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23530096     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.3747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  76 in total

1.  Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Prognostic Factors and Outcomes of a Series of Patients Treated at a Single Institution.

Authors:  Shraddha Patkar; Abhay K Kattepur; Rajesh Shinde; Mahesh Goel
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-15

2.  An Evaluation of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging System for Retroperitoneal Sarcomas Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB): Does Size Matter?

Authors:  Sarah B Fisher; Yi-Ju Chiang; Barry W Feig; Janice N Cormier; Kelly K Hunt; Keila E Torres; Christina L Roland
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 3.  Female pelvic floor biomechanics: bridging the gap.

Authors:  Deanna C Easley; Steven D Abramowitch; Pamela A Moalli
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.309

4.  Retroperitoneal sarcomas: patterns of care at diagnosis, prognostic factors and focus on main histological subtypes: a multicenter analysis of the French Sarcoma Group.

Authors:  M Toulmonde; S Bonvalot; P Méeus; E Stoeckle; O Riou; N Isambert; E Bompas; M Jafari; C Delcambre-Lair; E Saada; A Le Cesne; C Le Péchoux; J Y Blay; S Piperno-Neumann; C Chevreau; J O Bay; V Brouste; P Terrier; D Ranchère-Vince; A Neuville; A Italiano
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Sarcoma: primary retroperitoneal sarcoma-predicting survival.

Authors:  Murray F Brennan
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  [Intra-abdominal and retroperitoneal sarcomas].

Authors:  J Kirchberg; J Weitz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Radical Nephrectomy for Primary Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma Near the Kidney has a Beneficial Effect on Disease-Free Survival.

Authors:  Jinsoo Rhu; Chan Woo Cho; Kyo Won Lee; Hyojun Park; Jae Berm Park; Yoon-La Choi; Sung Joo Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Histology-based Classification Predicts Pattern of Recurrence and Improves Risk Stratification in Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

Authors:  Marcus C B Tan; Murray F Brennan; Deborah Kuk; Narasimhan P Agaram; Cristina R Antonescu; Li-Xuan Qin; Nicole Moraco; Aimee M Crago; Samuel Singer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Surgical management of retroperitoneal and pelvic sarcomas.

Authors:  Marcus C B Tan; Sam S Yoon
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Can Abdominal Computed Tomography Imaging Help Accurately Identify a Dedifferentiated Component in a Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma?

Authors:  Priya Bhosale; Jieqi Wang; Datla Varma; Corey Jensen; Madhavi Patnana; Wei Wei; Anil Chauhan; Barry Feig; Shreyaskumar Patel; Neeta Somaiah; Tara Sagebiel
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.