Literature DB >> 23529982

Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.

Don Husereau1, Michael Drummond, Stavros Petrou, Chris Carswell, David Moher, Dan Greenberg, Federico Augustovski, Andrew H Briggs, Josephine Mauskopf, Elizabeth Loder.   

Abstract

Economic evaluations of health interventions pose a particular challenge for reporting. There is also a need to consolidate and update existing guidelines and promote their use in a user friendly manner. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement is an attempt to consolidate and update previous health economic evaluation guidelines efforts into one current, useful reporting guidance. The primary audiences for the CHEERS statement are researchers reporting economic evaluations and the editors and peer reviewers assessing them for publication. The need for new reporting guidance was identified by a survey of medical editors. A list of possible items based on a systematic review was created. A two round, modified Delphi panel consisting of representatives from academia, clinical practice, industry, government, and the editorial community was conducted. Out of 44 candidate items, 24 items and accompanying recommendations were developed. The recommendations are contained in a user friendly, 24 item checklist. A copy of the statement, accompanying checklist, and this report can be found on the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluations Publication Guidelines Task Force website (www.ispor.org/TaskForces/EconomicPubGuidelines.asp). We hope CHEERS will lead to better reporting, and ultimately, better health decisions. To facilitate dissemination and uptake, the CHEERS statement is being co-published across 10 health economics and medical journals. We encourage other journals and groups, to endorse CHEERS. The author team plans to review the checklist for an update in five years.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23529982     DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f1049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  358 in total

1.  Role of Health Services Research in Producing High-Value Rehabilitation Care.

Authors:  Sean D Rundell; Adam P Goode; Janna L Friedly; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Sean D Sullivan; Brian W Bresnahan
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2015-08-27

2.  Modeling the Outcome of Systematic TPMT Genotyping or Phenotyping Before Azathioprine Prescription: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Zarca; Isabelle Durand-Zaleski; Marie-Anne Loriot; Gilles Chatellier; Nicolas Pallet
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  Cardiovascular disease: The price of a QALY--cost-effectiveness of statins in CKD.

Authors:  Vivekanand Jha; Gopesh K Modi
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 4.  Evaluation of the economic burden of Herpes Zoster (HZ) infection.

Authors:  Donatella Panatto; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Emanuela Rizzitelli; Paolo Bonanni; Sara Boccalini; Giancarlo Icardi; Roberto Gasparini; Daniela Amicizia
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Cost-effectiveness of live oral attenuated human rotavirus vaccine in Tanzania.

Authors:  George M Ruhago; Frida N Ngalesoni; Bjarne Robberstad; Ole F Norheim
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2015-04-28

6.  A Framework for Enhancing the Value of Research for Dissemination and Implementation.

Authors:  Gila Neta; Russell E Glasgow; Christopher R Carpenter; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Borsika A Rabin; Maria E Fernandez; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a French prospective single-center experience and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Regis Souche; Astrid Herrero; Guillaume Bourel; John Chauvat; Isabelle Pirlet; Françoise Guillon; David Nocca; Frederic Borie; Gregoire Mercier; Jean-Michel Fabre
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Cost-effectiveness of a faith-based lifestyle intervention for diabetes prevention among African Americans: A within-trial analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Rhodes; Eeshwar K Chandrasekar; Shivani A Patel; K M Venkat Narayan; Thomas V Joshua; Lovoria B Williams; Lucy Marion; Mohammed K Ali
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 5.602

9.  Simplifying contraception requirements for iPLEDGE: A decision analysis.

Authors:  John S Barbieri; Andrea H Roe; Arash Mostaghimi
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  An extended stroke rehabilitation service for people who have had a stroke: the EXTRAS RCT.

Authors:  Lisa Shaw; Nawaraj Bhattarai; Robin Cant; Avril Drummond; Gary A Ford; Anne Forster; Richard Francis; Katie Hills; Denise Howel; Anne Marie Laverty; Christopher McKevitt; Peter McMeekin; Christopher Price; Elaine Stamp; Eleanor Stevens; Luke Vale; Helen Rodgers
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.014

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.